tony parker>bibby?

[PM5K]

In this series, you don't even have to ask....

[smoke1]

Bibby needs to "Stop humping the Lazer!!!!"

"Mini Me? Mini Me? For God's sake would somone put a fricken bell on him or something."

"Mini Me, if I ever lost you I don't know what I would do. I would probably move on, get another clone but there would be a 15 minute period there where I would just be inconsolable."

[whottt]

Tony is a special PG, led the league with points in the paint. However, Bibby is more clutch, a better FT shooter, and has a better jumper. Also, Artest > Manu.

I didn't say Bibby was a bad player...he's just seriously over-rated. And I think most over-rated aspect of Bibby is the claim that he is clutch...

I agree he's got a better jumper and is a better FT shooter, additionally, he's a much better passer and true PG...Bibby is a talented offensive player.


But as a scorer he's not really better if he is better, and defensively he is much much worse.


As for Manu V Artest...Artest is probably more talented, especially on defense, but he's also a dumbass with emotional issues...which is why he gets traded every 2 or 3 years inspite of his awesome talent. The best part of Artest's game is his compe iveness...and Manu is more than his match in that area.

I'd take Parker and Manu over Bibby and Artest any day of the week...but then again I wouldn't even let Chris Webber on my team and you'd probably rather have him than Duncan.

[????????]

Parker is a much better scorer than Bibby because Parker shoots a much higher percentage for a guy that averages 19 a game. It's not about how much you score, it's about how many shots you have to take to get that amount. TP is far superior in this respect because he drives and finishes at the rim better than Bibby could ever hope to do. And D? Not even a question. Bibby blows.

[Spurologist]

Dasani > D'antoni

[mavsfan1000]

Bibby shoots 3 pointers. Parker takes layups. No surprise there is a big difference in percentages.

[????????]

Bibby shoots 3 pointers. Parker takes layups. No surprise there is a big difference in percentages.

Hey, you're catching on. I'll take a guy that shoots over 50% from 2 anytime over a guy jacking up threes. Going 9 for 14 from the floor is much better than going 16 for 35. The more possessions you score the more pressure you put on the other team. FG% is KEY.

[1Parker1]

Hey, you're catching on. I'll take a guy that shoots over 50% from 2 anytime over a guy jacking up threes. Going 9 for 14 from the floor is much better than going 16 for 35. The more possessions you score the more pressure you put on the other team. FG% is KEY.

Excellent point, Welcome to the Forum. I'm guessing you couldn't think of a screen name?

[Spurologist]

Hey, you're catching on. I'll take a guy that shoots over 50% from 2 anytime over a guy jacking up threes. Going 9 for 14 from the floor is much better than going 16 for 35. The more possessions you score the more pressure you put on the other team. FG% is KEY.

16 for 35 isn't bad actually. more like 6 for 35. welcome to the forum ????????

[IceColdBrewski]

Mike Bibby > Parker
Gilbert Arenas > Parker (some Spurs homers are still in denial about this one)
Jason Terry > Parker

[Cant_Be_Faded]

I don't agree with no. 1 or no. 3

[ducks]

ice who is better this series?

[IceColdBrewski]

I don't agree with no. 1 or no. 3

Both can hit the jumper a uva lot better than Parker. They also see the floor better. Parker is good at ONE thing. Driving to the basket. That's it.

[T Park]

Mike Bibby > Parker

Parker averagin about 20 something

Bibby about 12 this series.

Oh yeah......

[T Park]

Both can hit the jumper a uva lot better than Parker

Seems to me, parker has been hittin the jumper pretty well this series....

[SequSpur]

Sequ > Ducks + Tpark.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

Both can hit the jumper a uva lot better than Parker. They also see the floor better. Parker is good at ONE thing. Driving to the basket. That's it.

Parker's better at D

[T Park]

I just saw who posted this.

Don't bother.

Parker could average 30 a game the rest of the playoffs, and he would on him for not averaging 35.

[Spurologist]

Jason Terry > Parker

Incorrect response

[Nbadan]

What's the big deal? Bibby has had a terrible series. Credit Tony.

[T Park]

Thank you Dan!

whoa...

(faints)

[phyzik]

3>2

Pink laced with Red > Black laced with Pink > white

[Nbadan]

Black Wells headband > White Wells headband

[mike detroit]

my dog is probably a better player than bibby, so i would hope that tpark would be.

[Nbadan]

It's really surprising just how bad he's been. Look at the difference between Bibby (this year) and Billups (last year), just no comparison. He's got to have a better series or the Kings won't win in SA.