Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 35 of 35
  1. #26
    Veteran Slinkyman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    1,740
    honestly Tim is our best Center with Horry at the 4, in the off season we need to bring in some PFs to play along side Tim with Rasho on the bench in a glass case that reads, "break in case of emergency".

  2. #27
    Esse quam videri ploto's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    10,994
    It really is a simple matter of minutes and roles.

    First, with the small ball line-ups and the minutes played by Duncan and Horry, there has been only 10 to 12 minutes of time for a third big man. Pop even said last week that there were only minutes for 3 bigs and Nazr is the odd man out. In order to play Nazr, from whom do you want to take minutes? Surely, not TD and Rob. Is it simply a matter of wanting to give Rasho's minutes to Nazr? This is the main reason why that is not happening. The minutes Rasho is playing are primarily to give Tim a rest. If you look at the minutes played together recently- in the last 3 games- Rasho and Tm have been on the court together all of about 4 minutes grand total. Primarily, Rasho has played with Horry or as the lone big with 4 perimeter guys. You can't go small ball with Nazr as the lone big. Pop tried several times this year and it just does not work. The problem for Nazr is that he NEEDS to play alongside Tim and those minutes simply do not exist for the third big man- they are going to Horry (as the starter) or a guard, like Brent or Michael (in small line-ups). If you look at the last game, Pop tried to sub Nazr in for Tim in the second quarter, but after a minute and half, Tim was back in. The Spurs have seen that defensively their best option is to have either Tim or Rasho on the court at all times. And that is what they have been doing. Haven't you noticed that it is almost always Tim and Rasho subbing for each other? Nazr just does not fit into the roles they need right now. As long as the Spurs keep winning with Horry starting, and the Spurs choose to run some time with the small line-up, I don't really see things changing much for Nazr, especially when he hasn't seemed to adjust too well to his reduced role off the bench- which I must say Rasho did a pretty good job of this year.
    Last edited by ploto; 05-08-2006 at 10:30 PM.

  3. #28
    More Power to Me Despot's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    1,635
    But don't you all believe Nazr will be the first option against the Pistons? Rebounding should be at a premium. Of course Pop may just be trying to drive down his value.

  4. #29
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    It really is a simple matter of minutes and roles.

    First, with the small ball line-ups and the minutes played by Duncan and Horry, there has been only 10 to 12 minutes of time for a third big man. Pop even said last week that there were only minutes for 3 bigs and Nazr is the odd man out. In order to play Nazr, from whom do you want to take minutes? Surely, not TD and Rob. Is it simply a matter of wanting to give Rasho's minutes to Nazr? This is the main reason why that is not happening. The minutes Rasho is playing are primarily to give Tim a rest. If you look at the minutes played together recently- in the last 3 games- Rasho and Tm have been on the court together all of about 4 minutes grand total. Primarily, Rasho has played with Horry or as the lone big with 4 perimeter guys. You can't go small ball with Nazr as the lone big. Pop tried several times this year and it just does not work. The problem for Nazr is that he NEEDS to play alongside Tim and those minutes simply do not exist for the third big man- they are going to Horry or a guard, like Brent or Michael. The Spurs have seen that defensively their best option is to have either Tim or Rasho on the court at all times. And that is what they have been doing. Haven't you noticed that it is almost always Tim and Rasho subbing for each other? Nazr just does not fit into the roles they need right now. As long as the Spurs keep winning with Horry starting, and the Spurs choose to run some time with the small line-up, I don't really see things changing much for Nazr
    Good points. That was the best pro-Rasho post I've seen. It explains well why with Horry starting, Rasho will be the big off the bench.

    Up until:

    especially when he hasn't seemed to adjust too well to his reduced role off the bench- which I must say Rasho did a pretty good job of this year.
    Rasho's stats plummeted in the regular season coming off the bench. His per minute production went down across the board in everything except rebounding, which stayed about the same. However, against the Kings, Rasho was very good in the first two games. But that's not enough of a sample size to say that Rasho did a good job of adjusting to coming off the bench.

    Nazr, on the other hand, produced better off the bench. His rebounding and blocked shot numbers were way up, as was his field goal percentage.

    As of right now, I think it's fair to say which ever plays less bad will win the job here in the next couple games.

  5. #30
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Nazr Mohammed did a great job of losing the job in games 2 and 3.

  6. #31
    Esse quam videri ploto's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    10,994
    Rasho's stats plummeted in the regular season coming off the bench. His per minute production went down across the board in everything except rebounding, which stayed about the same. However, against the Kings, Rasho was very good in the first two games. But that's not enough of a sample size to say that Rasho did a good job of adjusting to coming off the bench.

    Nazr, on the other hand, produced better off the bench. His rebounding and blocked shot numbers were way up, as was his field goal percentage.
    I meant lately- not for the whole season. Rasho played very well off the bench the last couple of weeks of the regular season. It obviously took him a little time to adjust, but once he got used to it and played some time with guys like Brent and Michael, it seemed to become comfortable.

    I am referring to Nazr's going to the bench now- not at the beginning of the season. It took him until February to get that role down before. I know it has only been 3 games, but that is the only sample I have to go on.

  7. #32
    Drive For FIVE Spurologist's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    14,750
    More minutes for Nazr early and often. That is all. MORE MINUTES.

  8. #33
    Injured Reserve Vashner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    6,791
    LOL never seen Anyone end a career over a 3 pointer...

    Get over it pop...

  9. #34
    Seek True Love, within. bigzak25's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Post Count
    11,293
    Help Us Nazi One Kenobi, your our only hope...

  10. #35
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    49
    I don't care if Nazr doesn't come back after this year but we are going to need his physicality against Detroit. Period.

    Rasho's wilting ass is a prescription for certain failure against that team.

    My wife says the same thing about my ass. Ladies, is this true about rasho?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •