Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 32 of 32
  1. #26
    Say Uncle Uncle Donnie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    371
    Wasn't that an internet poll? If so, it is meaningless.
    No kidding. I think MSNBC had Kerry by more than 70% in their online poll. I might be willing to give Kerry an edge but no way it was that far apart. The DNC probably sent out another mass email.

    Just like with the vice-presidential debates, the phone polls will tell a much different story than the online polls. Internet polls are too easily ed with.

  2. #27
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    Fox just came in...

    Kerry 62%
    Bush 37%

    and Fox is conservative...

    pay up es...
    I'm sure McAuliffe had his blast-mail re-sent tonight.

  3. #28
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    More than a few of the names I heard were names of Republicans who supposedly disagree with Bush on the war.

    Was I wrong?
    Fox actually had one of the republicans on as an analyst that was supposedly "quoted"...he claimed it was taken completely out of context and didn't have anything to do with the full content of the quote...sorry...can't remember his name...

  4. #29
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    I don't understand the point of a rallying cry to vote on Internet polls en masse. What purpose does this serve to further your candidate's claim to the Presidency?

    Are people actually influenced to vote for the poll leader? Seriously, I'm curious. Because I would think leading in the polls would only invigorate the opposition, while simultaneously giving your supporters a false sense of security that may keep some of them home on Election Day.

    I could be totally wrong on this... I'm just a bit perplexed by the fact that any Party would try to rally their supporters by saturating Internet polls.

  5. #30
    Mrs.Useruser666 SpursWoman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    27,175
    Polls where the sample can't be controlled are completely, and utterly worthless.


    I think CBS's poll was Kerry 88% Bush 11%.


    If you think those are credible numbers, I think you need to get out and get some fresh air.

  6. #31
    Who's Your Caddy?! NeoConIV's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    2,024
    88-11...dang, that's hilarious. Exercises in manipulation.

    It's all good. if people think "I have a plan..." and "a fresh start, a new credibility" and "bring our allies to the table" etc won the debate, ok.

    To be honest, I think this debate basically sealed the election for Bush. Viewership is going to drop off dramatically for the third debate so no matter who wins, I don't think it will matter. Kerry's debate stylings work well in the blue states, but in the battleground states these debates are reaping undecideds...straight to victory. We shall see.

  7. #32
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    I think it's all a ploy to help build Kerry's self-esteem. Because, as all good liberals know, achievement follows self-esteem -- not the other way around.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •