Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 64
  1. #26
    Believe.
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    121
    Deng's good, but If I'm Paxson, I would rather hold onto Nocioni and Chandler.

    Hinrich
    Gordon
    Garnett
    Nocioni
    and Chandler would be an impressive line-up.
    Deng for KG?
    If Chicago want KG,they should give at least Noci+Hiinrich+their picks.

  2. #27
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    604
    Claxton has the china doll syndrome, but when he's healthy, he's goood. How much good? $2.5-3 million? Half the MLE.
    NY will pay full MLE, if LB is still the coach

  3. #28
    Germany's #1 Spurs Fan Streakyshooter08's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    989
    Well, I guess Barnes, Woods, DerMarr Johnson and Jones are affordable options. Woods had some really good performances for the Knicks but wasn't in the rotation for long. Jones seems to be a okay 3pt shooter.

    Jeffries and Thomas are also players to look at but I doubt Thomas is interested in comming to SA. I haven't seen much of Jeffries so I don't know if he would fit. Has nice lengt though...I don't know much about Evans also but he is be the best rebounder out there and from what I have seen, the Spurs really NEED good rebounders cause they got killed on the glass often this year. He averages about 8 reb in ca 21 mpg! That is pretty impressive...

    I think Evans, Thomas, Woods (even though I don't like him) and Jones might be the ones to make a push for.

    If the Spurs are able to trade Barry+X for J.R. Smith it would be great as well.

    How is Bobby Jacksons defense? Our backup PG should be abel to keep up with the fast guards in the league...if he is a good defender... get him.

  4. #29
    Believe. Wildcat Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    26
    Chuck Hayes would be a perfect addition to the Spurs. He is all hustle, can rebound really well for his size, and is a solid fundamental player. Price would be affordable as well. Solid Player.

    When he came out of Kentucky I thought he would be a good fit for the Spurs. Ignore the character issues, as the charges he had against him from a scorned lover are completely baseless and false.

  5. #30
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    The names that jump off at me on that list are Pollard, Claxton, B. Jackson, and Atkins.

    I hadn't thought about Pollard untill now, but I like the idea of bringing him in because of the way he plays.
    I hadn't thought about it, but Atkins might be a good cheap veteran to bring in.

    Does he have anything left, or is he Chucky Van Exel at this point?

  6. #31
    The Timeless One Leetonidas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    29,609
    These are the moves I'd like to see...

    Spurs pickup either Bobby Jackson or Speedy Claxton
    Spurs pickup Matt Barnes or Rasual Butler
    Spurs trade for JR Smith
    Spurs being in Robertas Javtokas

  7. #32
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    Jackson is a china doll, too. And I'm not entirely sure that he makes great decisions for a PG. His energy is usually very good and he get be a witch when he's hot, but he can't seem to make it through a full NBA season without some serious injury.

  8. #33
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    107
    R. Evans is a joke, I can't believe his name is mentioned here. Is that what the Spurs need? A nutcracker who can't shoot a FT to save his life?
    A name that hasn't been mentioned here is the Boston kid, Ryan Gomes, a rebounding machine who, unlike Evans, can score the ball.
    I'd love to see Josh Smith wearing a Spurs uniform with Jared Jeffries a close second candidate, but neither Atlanta, nor Washington will trade this kind of players.
    Gomes makes sense.

  9. #34
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    why do you post more since you are so much more knowledgable then us bringing up evans


    that way we have your great insight and we are not in the dark

  10. #35
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Out of all those PGs, Atkins is the most consistent and manages to stay healthiest. He had a good season with Memphis.

  11. #36
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    107
    Wiz let Atkins walk because he was complaining all the time about his lack of PT. TP doesn't play Arenas-like minutes, but he ain't BJax either. Mighty mouse was injured, so it'll be interesting to see where Chucky lands.

  12. #37
    Believe. Vingianx's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Post Count
    1,038
    wilcox showed a good rebounding stretch and not to mention offensive... did i mention athletic? he would be good for spurs

  13. #38
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    Why on Earth would the Celtics give up Gomes? As best I can tell, they have a team option on him this summer -- I can't imagine they won't exercise that.

  14. #39
    Veteran Slinkyman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    1,740
    NO to PGs over 30!

    NO to SFs under 6'7

    NO to PFs under 6'9

    NO to 6'6 PFs

    NO to unathletic white centers

    Yes to Wilcox but he will get a fat contract from either seattle or chicago and washington like him alot too but only have the MLE and Wilcox will probably cost more then that. So unlikely we get him.

    Yes to Jeffries but he's restricted. That said washington has 13 players under contract right now and are very close to the luxary tax threshold. Wash. needs a post player who's a 'banger' and can score inside so they may let Jeffries walk because he doesn't fill that need.

  15. #40
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    NO to PGs over 30!

    NO to SFs under 6'7

    NO to PFs under 6'9

    NO to 6'6 PFs

    NO to unathletic white centers
    I agree with this, except that I would be OK with PFs in the 6'7 or 6'8 range if they brought the right skill set -- and especially if they could play both forward positions.

  16. #41
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    NO to PGs over 30!

    That was uncalled for.



  17. #42
    Veteran Slinkyman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    1,740
    I'd say no to both those guys even the MVP because neither can play D, not now anyway and not on guys like devin harris

  18. #43
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    I don't want an offense liability as a starter with Parker/Manu/Bowen/Duncan.
    With a defensive player at PF or C, Spurs will never put the opposite team in matchup trouble. Every team has at least a good perimeter defender and a good paint defender. You can put the first on Manu and the second on Duncan.

    If you look more closely, we are one of the few playoff team (maybe the only ?) to have 2 starters who scored less than 10 ppg. Defending against us is not too difficult because you can have one or two defensive liability at SG/SF/PF/C and played without having a matcup trouble. We should be the team against who the opposite team must do some adjustement.

  19. #44
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    I don't want an offense liability as a starter with Parker/Manu/Bowen/Duncan.
    With a defensive player at PF or C, Spurs will never put the opposite team in matchup trouble. Every team has at least a good perimeter defender and a good paint defender. You can put the first on Manu and the second on Duncan.

    If you look more closely, we are one of the few playoff team (maybe the only ?) to have 2 starters who scored less than 10 ppg. Defending against us is not too difficult because you can have one or two defensive liability at SG/SF/PF/C and played without having a matcup trouble. We should be the team against who the opposite team must do some adjustement.
    Does that mean you like the idea of bringing in Scola? He's probably as good a scorer at PF or C as we could find.

  20. #45
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    Does that mean you like the idea of bringing in Scola? He's probably as good a scorer at PF or C as we could find.
    If we can't find a better solution, yes.
    Maybe i'm a dreamer but I think too that we can get Harington.
    If we can't get Harrington, Scola is maybe the best solution.

  21. #46
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    If we can't find a better solution, yes.
    Maybe i'm a dreamer but I think too that we can get Harington.
    If we can't get Harrington, Scola is maybe the best solution.
    If there's some way we could land him, Harrington could be huge -- he has both size and mobility, he has some range, he can penetrate, he's a decent rebounder and OK passer.

    If we could get him to really defend consistently, he would completely change what we could do on the court.

    Is there any chance he's available for the midlevel, or do we have to find someone Atlanta wants in a sign and trade?

  22. #47
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    I'm warming to the idea of Jumaine Jones being here next year.

  23. #48
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    Is there any chance he's available for the midlevel, or do have to find someone Atlanta wants in a sign and trade?
    He will be more expensive than the MLE. I say around $50M/6 years.
    He is an unrestricted free agent, his trade value is quite low. The problem is to find something with a salary big enough to match up Harrington salary that Atlanta like. Maybe Barry or trading Rasho + something to a third team under the cap and giving a trade exception to Atlanta.

  24. #49
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    I'm warming to the idea of Jumaine Jones being here next year.
    As a PF or a SF ?

  25. #50
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    107
    Jumaine Jones addresses quite some weaknesses. He's long, athletic, good defender, can even hit the 3pter. He hasn't played many minutes the last couple of years. He's been on the Spurs radar before, and most importantly he can come at an affordable price.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •