Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 44 of 44
  1. #26
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    195
    Tim Thomas is a BAD man



    Get this done, Phoenix. Shut up Cuban.

  2. #27
    Luck the Fakers Bob Lanier's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,425
    Don't forget Maurice Evans. Spurs could have signed him before Detroit snagged him.
    With the money they spent on Michael Finley, who's three inches taller and many times the defender that Evans is (not to mention much, much, much better offensively)? They made the best choice they could.

    Tim Thomas would probably be a good fit with San Antonio next year, particularly if Horry continues his downward slide. He's definitely a "long 3", and he can play decent defense every now and then.

  3. #28
    Veteran DubMcDub's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,764
    Actually he would have ended up getting a ton of playing time for the Spurs and it likley would have guaranteed him and the Spurs a berth in the finals. But he and the Spurs wouldn't have known that he'd end up with all that playng time when he signed with the Suns.

    SIgning Thomas for next year still wouldn't be the Spurs worst option.
    Yeah...Tim Thomas was obviously the missing link in this years Spurs le quest.

  4. #29
    Drive For FIVE Spurologist's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    14,750
    Yeah...Tim Thomas was obviously the missing link in this years Spurs le quest.
    I don't think the mavs are exactly stopping him. No one person will get you a ring. That's why it's called a hypothetical. Comprender?

  5. #30
    Veteran DubMcDub's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,764
    I don't think the mavs are exactly stopping him. No one person will get you a ring. That's why it's called a hypothetical. Comprender?
    What does the Mavs stopping him have anything to do with the point of this post? I'm pretty sure I never said Tim Thomas is a terrible player. I simply laughed at the absurd notion that his presence on the Spurs roster would have ensured a trip to the Finals.

    Pretty funny how you try to start an argument with me over nothing, though.

  6. #31
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    Yeah...Tim Thomas was obviously the missing link in this years Spurs le quest.
    If you watched the same series I did, maybe you noticed it was actually kind of close.

    We were playing Finley at the 4 in order to try to match up, but Thomas has 3 inches on him and is a better rebounder. Let Finley come off the bench, have Barry back up Parker, and park NVE on the bench, and that could easily have been the difference.

    We'll never know of course, and it doesn't really change anything, but it's the kind of thing we're prone to think about when we try to assemble a team to take your asses down next year.

  7. #32
    Veteran DubMcDub's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,764
    If you watched the same series I did, maybe you noticed it was actually kind of close.

    We were playing Finley at the 4 in order to try to match up, but Thomas has 3 inches on him and is a better rebounder. Let Finley come off the bench, have Barry back up Parker, and park NVE on the bench, and that could easily have been the difference.

    We'll never know of course, and it doesn't really change anything, but it's the kind of thing we're prone to think about when we try to assemble a team to take your asses down next year.
    It's quite suspect to assume that Tim Thomas would have made any difference on a Spurs team built like it was.

    Besides, I'd take Finley as a starter over him 7 days a week, and not just because Finley used to be a Mav. It's really not even close.

  8. #33
    Drive For FIVE Spurologist's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    14,750
    What does the Mavs stopping him have anything to do with the point of this post? I'm pretty sure I never said Tim Thomas is a terrible player. I simply laughed at the absurd notion that his presence on the Spurs roster would have ensured a trip to the Finals.

    Pretty funny how you try to start an argument with me over nothing, though.
    o. Remember. We played against the mavs, right? Right now Thomas is playing against the mavs and playing well. Put two and two together.

  9. #34
    Believe. strangeweather's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    1,805
    It's quite suspect to assume that Tim Thomas would have made any difference on a Spurs team built like it was.

    Besides, I'd take Finley as a starter over him 7 days a week, and not just because Finley used to be a Mav. It's really not even close.
    Understandable. But you guys killed us on the boards. Thomas likely would have helped with that.

    As I said, we'll never know.

  10. #35
    Veteran DubMcDub's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,764
    o. Remember. We played against the mavs, right? Right now Thomas is playing against the mavs and playing well. Put two and two together.
    Yeah, that's obviously the same. I hear the Spurs and the Suns play pretty similar styles and have pretty similar personnel .

    Plus, given the undeniable fact that Thomas has been equally good on all the other teams he's played for before the Suns, you clearly have a worthwhile point that he would have been a difference-maker for the Spurs so much so that they walk right into the NBA finals.

    ...Seriously, you need to quit being so damn desperate to try and prove me wrong about anything and everything you can find.

  11. #36
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    Excellent use of emoticoms DubMcDub. Really helps you make your argument. Fact is Spurs were essentially going with six players. Check the number of minutes logged by the starters and Finley in game seven. They also were getting very little scoring off the bench. If you don't think Thomas and his length, defense, rebounding, scoring wouldn't have likely tipped the scales in a sereis where all but one game was essentially decided by one point you better find an emoticom for "gee I'm dumb". I guess you just figure the Mavs were just plain invincible.

  12. #37
    Drive For FIVE Spurologist's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    14,750
    Yeah, that's obviously the same. I hear the Spurs and the Suns play pretty similar styles and have pretty similar personnel .

    Plus, given the undeniable fact that Thomas has been equally good on all the other teams he's played for before the Suns, you clearly have a worthwhile point that he would have been a difference-maker for the Spurs so much so that they walk right into the NBA finals.

    ...Seriously, you need to quit being so damn desperate to try and prove me wrong about anything and everything you can find.
    you can just call me the troll eradicator.

    FIN would have started against the mavs and manu would have come off the bench. He would clearly have the open shots. He's hot in the playoffs, plain and simple.

  13. #38
    Veteran DubMcDub's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,764
    Excellent use of emoticoms DubMcDub. Really helps you make your argument. Fact is Spurs were essentially going with six players. Check the number of minutes logged by the starters and Finley in game seven. They also were getting very little scoring off the bench. If you don't think Thomas and his length, defense, rebounding, scoring wouldn't have likely tipped the scales in a sereis where all but one game was essentially decided by one point you better find an emoticom for "gee I'm dumb". I guess you just figure the Mavs were just plain invincible.
    No. Just no.

    I figure the Mavs were a better team than the Spurs and a scrub-ass spare like Tim Thomas (no I'm not impressed by his 26 points in a 16 point loss for his team) wouldn't have made a difference.

    Thomas is a piece of and he's incredibly overrated. Throw some more numbers around though--he's definitely not a product of the Suns system at all.

  14. #39
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    Tim Thomas is a tool, albeit a talented one. He can help your team if:

    1) you don't over pay him.
    2) he isn't option one or two.

    He's kind of like an immature Lamar Odom. I can't believe he's still pulling like walking thru other team's huddles.

  15. #40
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    I don't buy that Tim Thomas would have guaranteed a trip to the Finals.

    I'm pretty sure, though, that a backup point guard who could contribute more than 1.1 ppg, 1.3 apg in 10 minutes per game would have.

  16. #41
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    Actually that scrubass is averaging over 16 PPG on .528 shooting against your invincible team, .577 from the three point line. Mavs' fans have gotten incredibly y in a hurry. Shouldn't they win at least one le before you act like annoit them the greatest?

  17. #42
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    Actually that scrubass is averaging over 16 PPG on .528 shooting against your invincible team, .577 from the three point line. Mavs' fans have gotten incredibly y in a hurry. Shouldn't they win at least one le before you act like annoit them the greatest?
    The point is, though, that the Suns system makes those opportunities for him. I'd be skeptical that the Spurs system would do the same, and I doubt that Popovich would have dramatically altered things just to accommodate Tim Thomas.

    Might Thomas have helped the Spurs? Sure, it's possible. But he also might have hurt more -- he might have deprived Manu, Parker, and Finley of shots that they made and Thomas might have missed. I don't think you can assume that his numbers would be the same if he had come here -- if you could, there'd be no rational explanation for why Thomas isn't a max player and why he wasn't in greater demand after he was released (if you could explain why he was released in the first place).

  18. #43
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    Thomas is a spot up three point shooter who can shoot pretty much around the perimeter, top of key or side, particularly top of key. Spurs do pretty well on getting shots for spot up shooters. Horry his supposed conterpart on the Spurs shot .250 and .143 from the 3 against the Mavs and by his own admission is no longer quick enough to play small ball. That was the Spurs greatest failing, counting on having a small ball lineup with Horry as their second big when he could no longer get it done. Second greatest failing, but much further down the line, was having to count on Nick the Quicksand as a backup PG.

    Thomas was released because they wanted to develop Deng nad Nocionni and didn't want around a disgruntled Thomas who was not getting playing time in a contract year.

  19. #44
    Free Throw Coach Aggie Hoopsfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Post Count
    31,094
    Mavs' fans have gotten incredibly y in a hurry. Shouldn't they win at least one le before you act like annoit them the greatest?
    Welcome to Dallas, TX, the city that thinks it's too good for the rest of the state of Texas.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •