Unproven talent. Once again, Rasho has been consistant his whole career.
Seeing as he's on the final year of his contract, that makes him trade bait.
Unproven talent. Once again, Rasho has been consistant his whole career.
Why? The Hornets will have alot of cap room this season and potentially even more next summer if they keep Brown his last year.
Bower would say "Why don't you keep him then?"
Expensive consistent mediocrity is a hard sell.
Money for whom? It's not like any great centers are flocking to play in NO with Chris Paul at any money, at least, not yet. Rasho would give the Hornets a locked center for the next few years.
Rasho is what he is, but there no gamble there. Bower could gamble on a younger center and maybe he'll luck out and find a undiscovered Boris Diaw, but I doubt. It will be interesting to see what kind of offers Nazr attracts.
Seeing as it was Paul's FIRST YEAR, you really can't say that with any certainty. Rasho simply doesn't strike me as the kind of player Scott would even consider taking on. Ever. Maybe some greener coach who thinks he can work with anyone -- Sam Mitc comes to mind.It's not like any great centers are flocking to play in NO with Chris Paul at any money, at least, not yet.
What would you rather have for $24 million:
Rasho for three seasons
or
Joel Przybilla for four/five seasons?
or
someone else entirely and run with PJ Brown/West and #16?
Be honest.
Has JR Smith got a basketball IQ or is he just another leaper? He hasn't shown he's any better rebounder than Bowen. Not a shotblocker for his position, poor assist numbers, lousy FG%. Don't see the attraction.
Barry gave the Spurs 2 memorable performances in the post season and a championship effort in 1 game of last year's finals. His shot has been very suspect outside of that.
Get some new, young-athletic blood on the team. I the Spurs are the professionals everyone touts them to be, J. R. Smith will only learn and eventually blossom into a great pickup.
Byron Scott giftwraps another young athletic swingman for the Spurs?
![]()
Who's the first???
ha ha ha.
He better not start about his playing time.He's only gonna be a 3rd year player. If he does start with that, he's gonna be the Terrell Owens of the NBA.(No offense to Terrell Owens.) But he's gonna be even worse because T.O. had time to prove himself, he hasn't.
Jack was a malcontent too who clashed with Scott. I think the Spurs could handle Smith.
I like Barry but we need youth on this team.Smith can play so id do the deal in a heartbeat.
If we could get Barry for Smith straight up, I'd take it. For that matter, if we could get Speedy in a S&T, that would be really nice.
But if we're going to have to take back cap filler, I'd rather keep Brent and try and move him somewhere else.
We don't necessarily have to take filler, although NOLA might want to throw in Macijauskas again. That still wouldn't be that bad.
I know we don't have to take filler for cap reasons, but if the Hornets make Macijauskas a condition of the deal, I'm not that thrilled with it. I'd rather either do a deal that holds down the luxury tax (hopefully so we can use the money elsewhere) or get back someone that's worth the cap dollars.
Yeah, another three point shooter for a squad that is reliant on three point shooters to give Tim room to operate is a horrible idea.if the Hornets make Macijauskas a condition of the deal, I'm not that thrilled with it.
Between having one guy you know you'll never use and two guys you might use, I'll take the latter.
It's exactly my thought on that trade.
Barry for Smith : great.
Barry for Smith+Macijauskas : not that great.
Macijauskas is an epically bad defender, but I suppose that doesn't matter, because we have a system, and players don't actually matter.
Macas whined about playing time with hornets.
If he whines enough, he'll just go back Europe.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)