Reply With Quote
Welcome to the forum...and, goodbye.
For tight games: ok
For a whole season though? At this point? Even with the age difference? Having both would be wonderful. Start Tony, throw Terry in there if its close/when you need a boost. But that's all.
Welcome to the forum...and, goodbye.
Did pussycoondotcom ever exist? His words sure don't.
No, pussycoondotcom= a 5 year old who needs to go back to bed before his mom finds out and takes away his tv watching privileges for the entire finals.
For the record it was not Kori that banned your stupid ass, it was whott. Also pussycoon.com is not a valid domain
For the regular season Tony Parker was noticably better this season. In the series meeting they were about equal. Terry just happened to have better games at more opportune times. Terry had some subpar games himself in the Spurs series, altough he did have a couple excellent ones.
Parker is better at creating his own offense, but Terry is money if you leave him open. Terry would probably be an excellent fit on SA but he hasn't played like the better player this season.
oh okay
Cubie got gang raped by gorillas so anything is possible.
I have proof
Tony's not unclutch. He's hit some pretty clutch shots.
Remember last year when he the three over Camby in OT?
I'd take Tony over any PG in the league because he's young and very experienced.
Tony...
Terry really wants max money? That's nuts, although I guess if he has a couple more games like tonight he may get close to it.
Seriously, who exactly would the Mavericks be bidding against in this case? I really doubt there's a team out there who has Terry in the middle of their rebuilding plan like Phoenix did for Nash...
edit: Oh, and Tony, to actually answer the question...
You have to remember you are on a spurs forum, they only see things how they want to.
More Consistant??
Bwahahahahahahahaha
Yeah like scoring 2 points in the 4th quarter plus OT in Game 7 that saw your demise?
They are both good basketball players.
I'd keep Tony. He shot 54% this season (Terry's career FG% is 44). Tony just turned 24; Terry is almost 29. Tony and Pop have a very good relationship. He has some shortcomings but I think that I'd give him another season or two before I'd consider trading him for anyone.
(And for Mavs fans who don't know - Tony doesn't score as much in the 4th because the Spurs game plan switches in the 4th and the ball doesn't go through him. Also, he was pretty hurt in the Mavs series so it's not a fair assessment of the norm for him.)
Nash is a liability on the defense. Tony is a pretty damn good defender.
Why would you bold part of what I said and then still spell the word incorrectly even though you had it spelled perfectly for you in the first place? I have no idea what "consistant" means.
As for the 2 points in the 4th quarter, the Spurs as a whole only scored 7 points. That was the only shot he took. He still finished the game with 24 points. He had more points than Terry in all but 2 games, and he was injured. Duncan missed 6 shots in OT, with several of them being ones he usually makes and 2 of them being lay-ups (essentially tip-ins). Does that mean Duncan had a bad game or is inconsistent or that I'd trade him for Dirk? No, no, and NO. It was overtime. They were all tired. The game plan for OT was to get the ball to Duncan. He was the one having the big game. It didn't work. Oh well, it was worth a try and was a logical move. Parker's a POINT guard. That's his job. His job isn't to go around and score tons of points like a shooting guard does. Maybe you should learn your positions. Actually scratch that, go back to school and learn how to spell first.
Nice excuse for someone who is known for dissapearing during playoff time....
Did I ever mention that global ignore ing rules?
Man, no need to be a jerk...Parker torched us good a few times this playoff series.
Not an excuse. Just reality. He averaged 21 ppg against the Mavs and could barely walk the night before a few of the games. He didn't shoot great, but he still did what he could. Yes, in the past, he faded in the playoffs on occasion since he didn't have a jumpshot. But since the All-Star break, he hit 46% of his shots outside 16 feet. So I think that's a good indicator of things to come.
Like I said, I think Terry is a very good basketball player too. But I think Tony fits here and will give him a couple more years of improvement before I'd think of trading him for anyone.
No, I for one would like to see the right calls being made. Unfortunately i don't see that in most games, but thats how I'd like to see it. I've always thought Shaq muscled his way into the basket, and by "muscled" I mean fouled. I'm not saying he didn't do that in this game, but on that one particular play, he got fouled first. That is all. Maybe the ones who are seeing things the way they want to is you Mavs fans who despite the fact that the rest of the country saw horrible refereeing in favor of the Mavs throughout the entire Spurs/Mavs series still deny that anything of the sort went on and act like its just Spurs fans making things up.
I think because the Spurs lost a lot of spurs fans only see the bad calls that went against the Spurs(which is natural). There were plenty to be sure but there were plenty of bad calls against Dallas too. Just like tonight's game... most Heat fans were upset at the ticky tack fouls on Haslem but they won't mention the 2 fouls that weren't called when Haslem pushed Dirk from behind on rebounds. Big calls went against the Spurs in game 3 and 4 but they also made crucial mistakes at the end of each game. Things have a way of breaking your way when you win a championship(not saying that the Mavs have already won) and teams that seem destined to win have that luck. Once Ginobilli fouled Dirk on that last play in game 7 it felt like Dallas' year(I thought the season was over after Ginobill hit that 3).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
