Had this guy not ed other airmen's wives on the base, this woldn't have happened.
And this attempted Clinton connection is weak. Show me the adultry law that applies to Presidents or STFU.
Yeah, sorry I left the U out of wouldn't. Fact remains this was pretty brazen.
I think you probably already know this but I was joking about the obviousness of your point.
I don't mess with peoples spelling, grammar or punctuation, that usually keeps them off my back about the same.
Sure, I was talking about the prosecution. Were it not airmen's wives or not being carried out on base fewer folks would care.
but not IN the military. The system is purposely set up so that the commander in chief is a civillian. don't you guys have american history classes down there?
Youre asking a people who inhabit a state that still feels it should be an independant nation, yet has supplied three Presidents for the Union.
Go figure.
No you forgot WTC 1993. But the 9/11 incident can be laid at his feet
also. Remember the guy stuffing papers in his socks. Wonder why that
was. You know Burglar. but just to satisfy you. WTC happen twice,
the first time 1993. As far as I know Bush wasn't President was he. But
guess you could blame him. And people did die in that act of terror.
So Clinton was active military when he got a blowjob and still serving as President (and active military, one must presume) on September 11.But the 9/11 incident can be laid at his feet also.
We caught those first guys. tisk,tisk. Intelligence does matter when you choose to accept it.(something george just can't do regarding anything).
Please consult with nester before replying. You should include your flock.
The reasons for this being an offense in the military are obvious and, during wartime, very relevant.
Anything a member of the armed forces does that compromises his integrity or makes him vulnerable to blackmail by anyone -- including enemy agents -- should be cause for concern and swift action.
Same goes for the Commander in Chief. Add to the fact that he perjured himself, and suborned perjury by others, in an effort to deny Paula Jones her due process rights, and you have a pretty solid case against him.
Too bad the Senate chickened out.
Show me the adultery statute for Presidents.Same goes for the Commander in Chief.
"nothing happens to him,"
huh? He was humiliated, pilloried, and then ing impeached, but the Senate Repugs went flaccid.
The Air Force officers are better than the rest of us and never dip their pens in forbidden ink? Right, keep believing their press releases. Hypocrits.
Okay Chumpy, follow the bouncing cursor...
First, note the use of the word "should." Second, I never mentioned the word adultery but proposed a broader idea that anything a military person or the President does that makes them vulnerable to blackmail should be cause for concern and swift action.
The President's perjury and suborning perjury and obstruction of justice were the vehicles through which that swift action could have been exercised. But, alas, the Senate chickened out.
Nice conclusion-jumping there.
Why was Clinton even asked about the blowjob?
Was Starr appointed to investigate blowjobs?
My conclusion is it was an enormous waste of time and money.
another repug proposing what should be. yipee
To establish that he was engaged in sexual activity with women other than his wife (probably exclusive of his wife). It was relevant to the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones.
No, he was appointed to investigate the Whitewater scam. When he uncovered other potential law violations by the President, he took his information back to the three-judge panel, appointed by Janet Reno, who then ordered him to pursue the tangential investigation related to the President's perjury and obstruction of justice in the Paula Jones lawsuit.
That's my conclusion as well...particularly since he wasn't brought to justice and thrown out of office.
Arkansas, on the other hand, saw fit to revoke his law license for the offenses.
So, you think it's okay for a President to have skeletons in his closet that may be exploited by the enemy?
Yeah, that's smart.
Zebra, let's examine your logic.
Bush jr. in office, 911 clintons fault.
Clinton in office, 93 WTC bombing bush sr. fault.
I don't blame your logic. It's what you have been programmed to repeat.
Are you refering to an enemy that believes there are 40 virgins waiting for them after death?
Please.
Any enemy.
Maybe it's why Clinton was so free with our nuclear technology and gave most of our secrets to China.
Maybe it's why he refused to bring Osama bin Laden to justice when he had the chance.
Maybe it's why he was reluctant to do anything about global terrorism during his eight years in office.
Who will ever know?
And, I thought it was 72 virgins. Are they running short?
Well, thanks for admitting it was a fishing expedition.Too bad for you lying about a blowjob doesn't rise to the level of high crime or misdemeanor.That's my conclusion as well...particularly since he wasn't brought to justice and thrown out of office.
Actually, I blame all Presidents going back to Jimmy Carter who failed to obliterate the Iranian regime after they attacked the U.S. Embassy.
I blame Ronald Reagan for not responding to the bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon.
I blame George H. W. Bush for agreeing not to continue on to Baghdad simply so he could operate out of Saudi Arabia.
And, yes, I blame Clinton who failed to respond to the many opportunities to defeat global terrorism after the '93 bombing of the WTC and the '00 attack on the USS Cole.
The current President is the first to adequately respond to Islamo-fascism.
Actually the perjury he committed was a felony.
Again, you misread. I never said it was a fishing expedition; only that it represented a waste of time because the Senate failed to convict.
But not a high crime or misdemeanor, apparently. I guess you have the definietion for that one.Actually the perjury he committed was a felony.I completely understand you only think it's a waste of time because it didn't end up the way you wanted it to.Again, you misread. I never said it was a fishing expedition; only that it represented a waste of time because the Senate failed to convict.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
