Hate Groups Infiltrate The Military in Iraq

[dougp]

the right-wingers have no response to the the facts of the Iraq war setting back the professional Army by many years, and effectively total abstention of 10s of milions eligible red-staters from participating in THEIR president's phony war.

You people really like to talk trash, but you have nothing to say of substance.
what a bunch of ing jokers.

How fast you democrats forget that Clinton cut the military back by a significant amount. It took us 2 years to get the amount of troops we have in Iraq now, what took 3 MONTHS in 1990.

Buy a in clue, this thing wouldn't be as messy if we actually had the number of troops, and budget that was CUT by Clinton.

[boutons_]

I am not a Democrat, but you mental error is par for the rabble "intellect".

"It took us 2 years to get the amount of troops we have in Iraq now, what took 3 MONTHS in 1990."

1990 was still in the period just after the collapse of the Soviet Empire in 1989, with US troops still at Cold War levels.

Also, going to fight in Kuwait against a US-type invasion of by Saddam of a non-threatening country was a of lot easier to recruit for than the phony Repug bull in Iraq.

If dubya was unhappy with the troop levels between Jan - Sep 2001, why didn't he increase the troop levels then (he ing already knew then he was going to invade Iraq no matter what, a Repug decision taken a year or two earlier). He didn't. All he and Repgus did in that period was ram through a huge tax cut for the rich + corps and go on holiday.

The fatal hammer blow to your weak is that Shinsheki was fired for saying Iraq would need 400K troops a la the Powell doctrine of overwhelming force, but Rummy wanted to do Iraq on the cheap (the funds were gone into tax cuts), with a light, mobile force, totally unforseeing a protracted insurgency.

The Repugs have ed the US military in Iraq, and Iraq will the Repugs in the elections. Red-staters don't believe in this war now. They refuse to enlist and support dubya with their bodies to provide relief for the poor mofo's trapped in multiple trips to Iraq, stop-loss orders, etc.

Blaming the Rupug up in Iraq on Clinton is ridiculous, but again, par for the rabble course.

[mookie2001]

dam boutons reigns in blood on yall neocons!

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

If dubya was unhappy with the troop levels between Jan - Sep 2001, why didn't he increase the troop levels then (he ing already knew then he was going to invade Iraq no matter what, a Repug decision taken a year or two earlier). He didn't. All he and Repgus did in that period was ram through a huge tax cut for the rich + corps and go on holiday.

Actually at that point Bush was already working on increasing troop levels and defense spending.

Try again, croutons

They refuse to enlist and support dubya with their bodies to provide relief for the poor mofo's trapped in multiple trips to Iraq, stop-loss orders, etc.

I know 8 different guys who are and have been over in Iraq multiple times. All are there because they wanted to be their with their comrades, not because of your re ed stop-loss buzz word that you stole from whinyassliberalunderground.com