Limbaugh Audience are very knowledgeable....

[Obstructed_View]

Libs hate a conservative with a sense of humor almost as much as they love thinking they are the intelligentsia of the US.

[Obstructed_View]

Is that supposed to be "Limbaugh audiences are very knowledgeable" OR "Limbaugh audience is very knowledgeable"

You are a serious DUMBASS!
What school did you go to?

The word "audience" is a collective noun and can be either singular or plural.

What school did you go to?

[gtownspur]

The word "audience" is a collective noun and can be either singular or plural.

What school did you go to?

Don't insult his lack of intelligence.(notice i didnt say intelligence)

He has an arsenal of lame yo mama jokes that he will unleash.

Complete waste of one's time.

[gtown's dad]

We just love Rush, My son and I listen to him all the time, in bed.

[sickdsm]

You have a small penus.


...........Your mom.



newbie.





There. Now we've officially covered all the moronic internet comebacks in this thread.


Oh, GTFO and pwned also.

[Nbadan]

We just love Rush, My son and I listen to him all the time, in bed.

Actually, that just about said it all.

:vomit

[RandomGuy]

Colbert Report >>> Daily Show and is much more conservative too, its like the bas ginger son of fox news

Um, no. If you think the Colbert Report is conservative, you don't get the joke.

[RandomGuy]

Yep, I think the BBC takes the reward for most liberal. NPR is rather moderate.

Yup.

NPR is a bit more liberal than most listeners will admit, but more moderate than most conservatives think.

It is a sypmtom of how extreme conservatism has gotten in this country that anything to the left of Attilla the Hun is "liberal".

[Obstructed_View]

Yup.

NPR is a bit more liberal than most listeners will admit, but more moderate than most conservatives think.

It is a sypmtom of how extreme conservatism has gotten in this country that anything to the left of Attilla the Hun is "liberal".

It's a symptom of how extreme liberalism has gotten in this country that rooting for America's enemies and hoping for failure of US policy is considered "moderate" and that someone would compare conservatives to huns and actually be serious.

[RandomGuy]

It's a symptom of how extreme liberalism has gotten in this country that rooting for America's enemies and hoping for failure of US policy is considered "moderate" and that someone would compare conservatives to huns and actually be serious.

1) Name or find 10 liberals that "root" for America's enemies.

The demogogues who say liberals hate America are wrong. If you want to prove your point you will have to provide a minimum of proof.

2) As a liberal I don't "hope" for US policy to fail. Quite the opposite. I really wish our policies work.

As someone who knows a bit more about the world, however, I know that they won't because they are predicated more on ignorance than facts or any kind of plan. This administration's incompetance and ignorance will doom our policies, regardless of my wishing otherwise.

3) I was using a rhetorical exaggeration, but was quite serious about the current extremist streak in conservative politics these days.

It is said that "revolutions eat their children", and we are seeing that all over again now, in as clear of a case of history repeating itself as one can ever find.

What this means is that revolutions happen when people are upset about something, such as the French about their monarchy, the Bolsheviks about the Czars or what have you.

After the revolution, the more moderate factions of that revolution are then not "revolutionary" enough for the real radicals, and cast as somehow sympathetic to "the enemy". The French "reign of terror" and the purges in post revolution USSR are good examples.

In America, we had something of a conservative backlash against the "hippy" (for wont of a better term) movement and liberal streak taken during and after the Vietnam war. The stirrings began with Reagan and the self-proclaimed "Republican revolution" led by Newt et al. lived up to its moniker. The old guard solid democrat controlled congress was replaced with ever-growing GOP majorities until today.

Now we have examples of moderates in the GOP being attacked for not being "conservative" enough, and many completely shut out of power within the GOP.

This is what I was alluding to, when I compared conservatives to "huns", and why I regard the GOP as being controlled by extremists. Your words, as well as many other conservative voices and tallking heads, do nothing but confirm this analysis with unending demogoguery of both "liberals" and any moderates unfortunate enough to be caught in the crossfire.

[RandomGuy]

FYI:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Terror

A fair description of post revolutionary France.

[Mr Dio]

The word "audience" is a collective noun and can be either singular or plural.

What school did you go to?

What school did you go to?
Whatever campus that is then you all are obviously much more informed than MS Word.
Wow!, you have out smarted Microsoft!!!!

Go ahead & type it in there & do a grammar check.
You are toooo smart for me!

[George Gervin's Afro]

It's very simple. If you don't subscribe to the way this administration is choosing to fight terrorism then you want the terrorists to win and or America to lose. See this way when they f*ck up and people criticize them they can in turn be cursed as wanting America to fail.. quite silly actually..

[Mr Dio]

Don't insult his lack of intelligence.(notice i didnt say intelligence)

He has an arsenal of lame yo mama jokes that he will unleash.

Complete waste of one's time.

How sweet, you jump on your boyfriend's back & hump along with him.
Nice try girls.

[George Gervin's Afro]

1) Name or find 10 liberals that "root" for America's enemies.

The demogogues who say liberals hate America are wrong. If you want to prove your point you will have to provide a minimum of proof.

2) As a liberal I don't "hope" for US policy to fail. Quite the opposite. I really wish our policies work.

As someone who knows a bit more about the world, however, I know that they won't because they are predicated more on ignorance than facts or any kind of plan. This administration's incompetance and ignorance will doom our policies, regardless of my wishing otherwise.

3) I was using a rhetorical exaggeration, but was quite serious about the current extremist streak in conservative politics these days.

It is said that "revolutions eat their children", and we are seeing that all over again now, in as clear of a case of history repeating itself as one can ever find.

What this means is that revolutions happen when people are upset about something, such as the French about their monarchy, the Bolsheviks about the Czars or what have you.

After the revolution, the more moderate factions of that revolution are then not "revolutionary" enough for the real radicals, and cast as somehow sympathetic to "the enemy". The French "reign of terror" and the purges in post revolution USSR are good examples.

In America, we had something of a conservative backlash against the "hippy" (for wont of a better term) movement and liberal streak taken during and after the Vietnam war. The stirrings began with Reagan and the self-proclaimed "Republican revolution" led by Newt et al. lived up to its moniker. The old guard solid democrat controlled congress was replaced with ever-growing GOP majorities until today.

Now we have examples of moderates in the GOP being attacked for not being "conservative" enough, and many completely shut out of power within the GOP.

This is what I was alluding to, when I compared conservatives to "huns", and why I regard the GOP as being controlled by extremists. Your words, as well as many other conservative voices and tallking heads, do nothing but confirm this analysis with unending demogoguery of both "liberals" and any moderates unfortunate enough to be caught in the crossfire.

Yes these are the same folks (talk radio circuit) that claim the dems have no room for dissenting opnions and use lieberman as an example .. they then turn around and talk of getting rid of the liberal republicans such as chafee and spector..most of these people are such blatant hypocrites they don't realize what they are saying..

[RandomGuy]

Yes these are the same folks (talk radio circuit) that claim the dems have no room for dissenting opnions and use lieberman as an example .. they then turn around and talk of getting rid of the liberal republicans such as chafee and spector..most of these people are such blatant hypocrites they don't realize what they are saying..

Bingo. I couldn't think of the moderates' names, or I would have named them. Thanks.