Reply With Quote
it wasn't rigger t-mac is an idiot
That was rigged
Mavs '07 champs
it wasn't rigger t-mac is an idiot
Tracy Mcgrady is a . He sucks, his team sucks and he is just pissed about it.
You sound like Yoda
well said......let's read it again. Not total FTA, it's WHEN they occurred and even in the finals.....DIRK had a chance in the final seconds to win a game on the line and he choked. Blame your owner for influencing the league to call it so damn tight.......he took credit for it on Letterman while he talked about how Dallas was going to party....
The only thing that sucks harder than the Mavericks is their crybaby fans.
if he was pissed, why would he be pissed at the heat and be rooting for the mavs? that makes no sense.
Because Wade just leapfrogged him in popularity.
Are Mav fans aware that even in Mark Cuban's NBA there's no rule that says both teams should shoot the same number of free throws? Free throw differentials prove nothing, especially when your best player's nuts shrivel up on the NBA's biggest stage. That had more to do with the free throws than any preferential treatment the Heat were supposedly getting.
Ah, kind of like a ticky-tack tap to Michael Finley's shorts that got Jason Terry suspended for a crucial game...that kind of ticky-tack?
By the way, only twice did a player foul out during the series for the Spurs...five Mavericks fouled out and one was suspended for a game.
And I'm not saying that this series was well officiated...far from it. But BS calls benefited both teams, not just one (like the Finals). Taking individual calls out of context is not seeing the forest for the trees. Your team had more free throw attempts, your star player got better star treatment, nobody on your team got suspended for a crucial game on a technicality, and you had three fewer instances of a player fouling out of a game.
LOL what do you call games 5 and 6 of the finals? and how about game 5 of Round 2 when terry calls timeout and they call jump ball instead? How about tony parker yanking on dirk's jersey as he's trying to tip it in at the last second? How about the fact that Tim Duncan commits a foul every time he posts up a player on offense? your team got away with plenty of calls as well. which is fine, as long as it's even. and EVERY STATISTIC IN THE BOOK shows that the Spurs-Mavs series was evenly (and very poorly) officiated.
stats don't say the same thing about the Finals.
Since when are foul calls supposed to be even for both teams?
I'd like a link to that rule.
funny how out of one side of their mouths, Spurs fans call Mark Cuban the biggest moron alive...and out of the other, suddenly he's genius enough to influence a league that was a multi-billion dollar business before he was around into running things his way, even to the detriment of his own team...
Well, since a punch in the balls is a "tap"...
here you go, homey. http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_gu...av=ArticleList
notable is..."If all officials possess the same conception there will be a guaranteed uniformity in the administration of all contests."
also note..."The restrictions placed upon the player by the rules are intended to create a balance of play, equal opportunity for the defense and the offense"
foul calls don't have to be even, but according to the rulebook, if an official is doing his job propery, everything will balance out in the end. have a nice day.
Thank you.foul calls don't have to be even
and if tony parker hit jerry stackhouse in the balls with the same minimal amount of force as terry hit finley, and he got suspended for game 6 of that series, you wouldn't be ing about it?
your welcome. although i've said that many times already. do you pick and choose what you decide to read?
No. Only a complete idiot would defend punching a guy in the nuts during a professional basketball game.
I read it all. Your argument is based upon the number of fouls. And upon that it failed miserably.
very true. i'm glad i'm not a complete idiot in this regard. unless you can show me anywhere where i've defended jason terry's actions...
re-read it. you've missed quite a bit.
Nah, it's garden variety Mav .
this guys great
possibly so. but if you actually read it all in the first place you'd know that number of fouls was never the focal point. the FTA "disparity" was brought into the subject by a pickle ing Spurs fan who wanted to about "garden variety Mav ".
might i suggest this? http://www.readingcomprehensionconnection.com/ have a great day.
Obviously so.possibly so.Actually you are ing that the Mavs were jobbed and should have had fewer fouls than actually were called in the supposedly evenly called series.but if you actually read it all in the first place you'd know that number of fouls was never the focal point.
Great.
Go tap yourself in the balls.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
