Not going back to the NBA Finals = Implosion
Now that I got it straight, and am delighted that the Pistons got rid of Ben Whathisname, who I guess played for them recently, this debate should be over. I guess its funny that the Pistons, who lost their championship winning coach last year, and lost their best defensive presence this year are going to have to do some tinkering with their formula for sucess because of this change are considered to be imploding, while a team with three NBA rings, who hasn't lost any significant contributors on the floor, or on the bench, lost a game seven, at home, to a team that a lot of basketball fans considered soft. I guess its just something that is kind of funny I guess.
Question: If you were a gm, and had the cap space, and had the oppurtunity to match the contract Chicago offered Ben Wallace, the entire thing, would you have matched it?
I know from what I saw this past year, there is not a chance in I would've done so.

Exactly. I'm not saying that the Pistons are gonna be a lottery team or anything. I just don't think they'll be able to make it back to the Finals without Ben Wallace.
Reply With Quote
