Reply With Quote
Dan, then what keeps these people from voting again and again all over the place? If they give an address then they maybe they should actually LIVE there!
It's a when you get challenged trying to pad an election ain't it Dan?
Dan, then what keeps these people from voting again and again all over the place? If they give an address then they maybe they should actually LIVE there!
If they're registered, they should have a valid mailing address.How is any of this not a barrier to a person's right to vote? If a person is registered and has a valid ID they should be allowed to vote.
But this whining is what I expect from Dan. I can't wait to hear Kerry complain that he lost Ohio because Mary Poppins at 1234 Supercalifragilisticexpialadocious Way couldn't vote.
I don't know, lets ask Diebold.It's a when you get challenged trying to pad an election ain't it Dan?
Really? These are "people" who had their voter registrations sent to invalid addresses...I think it's appropriate they prove their eligibility.
What about your drivers license and voter registration numbers? There are enough safeguards in place to keep people from repeaditly voting.Dan, then what keeps these people from voting again and again all over the place? If they give an address then they maybe they should actually LIVE there!
Kerry will win Ohio.But this whining is what I expect from Dan. I can't wait to hear Kerry complain that he lost Ohio because Mary Poppins at 1234 Supercalifragilisticexpialadocious Way couldn't vote.
Nice of you folks to disenfranchise the homeless in one fell swoop.
You guys rock.
Fine Dan, I agree. But if you put SOME false information on your registration the I think you should be checked out. What's the big deal with that?
I wonder how many registered Republicans were challenged? This is partisan bull . Let the state handle possible fraud cases.Really? These are "people" who had their voter registrations sent to invalid addresses...I think it's appropriate they prove their eligibility
Bring proof that you are who you claim to be. NO ONE IS ABOVE THIS!!!
Boy, you are the spinmeister!
The big deal is that we are trying to encourage more people to participate in our democratic system. This is why we spend millions on get out the vote drives. Putting up barriers to discourage or keep people from voting when they are legally registered to do so is chicken .Fine Dan, I agree. But if you put SOME false information on your registration the I think you should be checked out. What's the big deal with that?
Actually, it's not a requirement--unless someone makes a stink about it.Bring proof that you are who you claim to be. NO ONE IS ABOVE THIS!!!
I think state ID cards should be much easier to get to avoid this kind of problem.
Get over yourself Dan. When the democratic lawyers ran around the country and got Nader off the ballot for hokey names, it was upholding the voting process in your eyes.I wonder how many registered Republicans were challenged? This is partisan bull . Let the state handle possible fraud cases.
Now Repubs are ensuring the same "standards" on "registered" voters, it's "partisan bull ."
Whatever.
Boy, you are the spinmeister!Where's the spin?If they're registered, they should have a valid mailing address.
Barriers? Like I have to be able to see to drive a car? IF they can't get the info straight then they should be voting. You have to have the ability to prove that you are who you say you are. It absolutly necessary. If we can't get that then there is no reason to have an election. I have never said these people should not get to vote. But I believe it is perfectly fair to have your info challenge if you put down some bogus stuff. Isn't that common sense? If a cop stops me and asks where I live, and I tell him Sugar Road out by Candy Mountain, can he not challenge me to prove that?
I'm sorry, the Demoncrats were prevented from doing the same thing how?
I really don't think we are talking about the homeless in this thread Chump. Nice try!
Democrats aren't trying to suppress the vote.I'm sorry, the Demoncrats were prevented from doing the same thing how?
He typed that with a straight face, I bet.
Yeah, not at all. [/Ralph Nader]Democrats aren't trying to suppress the vote.
Sorry. It's about valid mailing addresses. If that's the litmus test, the homeless are disenfranchised. Is this not a valid conclusion?I really don't think we are talking about the homeless in this thread Chump. Nice try!
I almost missed this one...
They are only challenging registrants who had mail returned from the address listed when they applied for the registration. How is that "disenfranchising the homeless?" If the voter put an mailable address on the registration, it should at least be a valid address...
Who in here remebers when they used to canvass voters?
No, it's not.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
