Reply With Quote
Personally, I think anyone that sides with either the left or the right are blinded by political sun glasses. That's just me though.
Jackass, it was a joke, read the rest of the quote, "I reserve the right to use the 51% thing until the November elections". I see sense of humor and ability to pick up on sarcasm isn't one of your strong suits.
, RandomGuy might drive me insane, but at least he picks up on when I'm joking or not, you're just an idiot.
I agree for once!!
Personally, I think anyone that sides with either the left or the right are blinded by political sun glasses. That's just me though.
I know, you're so sophisticated that humor is just ridiculous to you. That is why you have such a clever name like the "spurminator"
You don't consider all the hand-wringing and condemnations of Israel over the deaths of Lebanese and Palestinian civilians to be product of appeasing whiners that just wanted Israel to roll-over and give Hezbollah and Hamas whatever they wanted -- just so the civilians deaths would stop?
I think a person with any common sense at all would say, "Damn! they let their kids hang out with people shooting at the IDF? No freakin' wonder so many of them are dead."
Oh, that's right, opposite world. Got it.
Believe me I don't subscribe to all of the Democrats actions or words. I am someone who can at least review the options in front of me and decide for myslef what is right and wrong. Now if you ask me John Kerry was a horrible candidate and I had to hold my nose voting for him but he was far better than Bush in my eyes.
Why? Because I don't have to scour blogs to refute someone's point. There are things in today's political climate that are very simple to see what is going on irregardless of what people say. I don't care if you believe me because I am not a hypocrite nor a kool aid drinking democrat.
Actually, I'm so sophisticated that my humor is on a completely different plane. Thus, it's difficult for me to backtrack and recognize lower levels of humor... Kind of like a 25 year old watching Teletubbies.I know, you're so sophisticated that humor is just ridiculous to you. That is why you have such a clever name like the "spurminator"
For example, "Spurminator" to you might appear to be a lazily-executed alias derived by combining my favorite basketball team with a film character.
However, there are several other layers to it, beyond even the obvious possible sexual connotations. I couldn't possibly explain it in writing. You'll just have to trust me.
I can't deny it, that was a good response.
are you the sponge?
What do you scour to refute someone's point? That you think relying on your own point of view rather than that of one (or, in many cases, more) people who actually spend their lives informing themselves on particular issues makes you more believable is rather amusing.
Well, if you don't care, why implore us to believe you -- kool aid drinker?
I find it hilarious how you can find that photo conclusive. If I was watching that picture without the text you would think that was just target practice, the children and the rest are just staring and don't seem worried at all. Plus we all know how reliable the press is... oh but wait, this one supports your point of view so it must be legit right? I don't see how you are any better than NBADan when it comes to pimping your political views
That's not really fair, we let croutons come on here every day with articles that only pimp his political views and everyone lets that fly.
It's called common sense! Jesus your not as smart as I gave you credit for..
Okay, got it.
I guess I could scour for liberal blogs to make my point. would that make more informed? or would that make me intellectually dishonest for only looking for the liberal point of view?
What makes you think I only look at the conservative point of view or, that it is the patently partisan conservative blogs from which I form an opinion?
I would quote from liberal blogs more but, like you, they base their rhetoric on what they, themselves, believe to be true and not on any linked source material.
If you look back, you'll find that most of my posts linked to the source material on which the opinions are drawn. I rarely -- if ever -- see that at the Huffington Post, Daily Kos, or Democratic Underground.
My most frequently used blogs for posting in here are Powerline, Belmont Club, Thomas Jocelyn, and Volokh Conspiracy -- none of whom could be characterized as rabid conservatives and all of whom could be characterized as thoughtful and objective.
I'd match them and their opinions of current events against your brain's conception of "common sense" any day of the week.
Manumania, Yoni will respond to your points when he gets to the appropriate blog.
Hey, just as the blogosphere set about debunking the myths created by media in their photojournalism of the conflict when it pointed to Israeli atrocities, I would expect nothing less from them now.
If it is a fabricated photo, let's see the evidence.
Maybe Daily Kos, or Huffington Post, or any one of a number of reputable ::cough cough:: liberal blogs will tackle this issue.
That does lead me to a question. Just what are the reputable Liberal Blogs? Seriously, I'd like to read from some that the liberals, in this forum, believe are the most objective, fair, and honest.
2 weeks ago no one was using the word 'appeasers'. Now it's the new Rove-approved playground insult.
It's the 'flip-floper' for 2006.
You prefer terrorist sympathizer? Collaborator?
Thats so right on.
Well, you know, as conversations evolve new images are evoked.
AKA You repeat what you hear the mouthpieces say. The new buzzwords are great. OMG they're appeasers!
Whether or not there are true historical lines to be drawn between the 2 situations is irrelevant becauses your leaders have uttered the words and it is now your duty to repeat them.
Its regurgitation and repe ion. What else is to be expected from a plagerist?
You're a parrot.
Oh, and blog entries are not conversations. Nor are speeches. Its rhetoric. So yes, as rhetoric is repeated new images are evoked...I guess?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
