Reply With Quote
It's dumbass on quite a few levels.
He didn't. That's the dumbass part.
It's dumbass on quite a few levels.
Where were your cries when Michael Moore was airing his epic fantasy show prior to the last election? Is it only fair to do like that when it helps your democraptic party? It's politics, ing deal with it.The Repugs started the distraction, weeks before the election, with the ABC fantasy show.
You're really a ing moron, you know that?The Repugs also did nothing more in their 8 months than the Clinton did, but the Repugs think they can trash Clinton.
ABC aired it's little docudrama, which by the way, was critical of BOTH Bush and Clinton's lack of interest in going after AQ prior to 9/11.
Then all the polls showed an uptick for Bush when people realized it wasn't all his fault, as the Demos had been insisting for the last two years.
So, to respond to that Clinton had his little blow up the other day to distract from the ABC fallout, and to top it off you had the leak of the NIE memo.
It's politics as usual, but quick with the Republican conspiracy bull . The democrats are just as guilty as the Repubs, and it gets pretty boring hearing about those mean little Republican party strategists fighting back when the Demos do the same thing to Bush and Co.
I get the sense that if Clinton and W. fought in a ring, croutons would cry if Bush actually got to hit back and would insist that Bush fought with both hands tied behind his back to "make it fair."
I've proven that Gore won in numerous other threads in this forum, most having to do with Diebold, and ES&S. If anyone wants to look at these threads they can always google my name and Al Gore, 2004 or some combination.
My point in this thread was that if they followed the most stringent standard to count the over-votes and under-votes in the 2004 Presidential election in FL, which I believe should have counted, Al Gore wins. So the people who couldn't punch their votes correctly were actually Bush voters if you are to believe the final verdict.
Also, the Democratic Precinct officer infamous for the Palm Beach butter-fly ballot was a Democrat in name only simply because the office had traditionally been held by a Democrat.
Okay, Dan, you've proven nothing. You've merely satisfied your moonbat mind of the rightness of your moonbat conspiracies. Nice going.
Proving something would require there to be irrefutable evidence of your proposition. So far, you've been unconvincing.
IF there was really enough proof out there, I'd venture to say that someone from the left up on Capitol Hill would have rolled out impeachment proceedings by now.I've proven that Gore won in numerous other threads in this forum,...
I applaud you and ask again, who the cares?
Bush is in office and will stay there for two more years. Gore is doing films about the climate. That ain't changing, no matter how many threads you start.
And the fact that two years after the events, you keep dwelling on what happened then, is sad. Sad, I say.
S-A-D.
It's actually been six years.
I applaud you and ask again, who the cares?
Bush is in office and will stay there for two more years. Gore is doing films about the climate. That ain't changing, no matter how many threads you start.
And the fact that two years after the events, you keep dwelling on what happened then, is sad. Sad, I say.
S-A-D.
I stole them elections fair and square!
, you are right. Six years!
Even S-A-D-D-E-R.
And he still hasn't caught Bin Laden?
Yonivore you will only know the truth after you die. That Gore was the real winner. Life is often not fair and only after you die will all truth be known.
No sense arguing this. You will know the truth.
Damn, that's some piece of work there Dan. Proving Al Gore won an election he wasn't even on the ballot for.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
