I don't even want to hear about Avery Johnson, Mr I took a 60 win team to 60 wins....
Without Dirk and the rest of his very fine group of players, where would Avery be? In order to win championships, every coach has to rely on a few great players and some second tier players and develop a system that uses them well.
I think Pop has proven he can take unproven players like Manu and Parker(no one knew how they'd work out remember) and limited role players like Bowen and Rasho/Nazr and put them together with his main man Tim and produce championships.
I don't even want to hear about Avery Johnson, Mr I took a 60 win team to 60 wins....
undefined
#1] ALL coaches are only as good as the players they have. Riley has never won with average talent. He always needs 2 superstars. Ditto the Zen Master! I guess Larry Brown lost his ability in NY.
2] I don't think we are having this discussion if the refs don't suck in their whistles in the last minute of game 7 or don't give Tim a 6th foul for stepping on Dirk's foot or give Dirk 28[?] freethrows. Incredible for a 7 foot jump shooter. IMO Avery's style will wear thin this year---the honeymoons over in Boysville.
Finally, I wouldn't TRADE Pop for Avery or the Zen master. It ain't about X's or O's as much as Pop's ability to get his players to buy into the TEAM thing and get rid of malcontents. In fact, the best basketball mind around is probably Hubie Brown.
Small ball took a Spurs in five or six series and made it a Mavs in 7 series. Nobody in their right mind would have praised small ball after the layup drill it provided for the Mavs, other than the Mavs.
Hard to overrate a coach that has 3 rings.
I have Pop, and Phil up there as 1 and 2 myself. I'm holding out on AJ for a few more seasons before I say he's elite, but he's certaainly up there.
What a mav fan who pretends to be a rocket fan? As much as you claim to be a rocket fan you sure do hang HARD on the mavs nuts. You should stop fronting and just admit it you don't fool anyone.
Phil Jackson was able to get stars to buy into a system, role players to make star plays, and was so good at the psychological aspect of coaching, his teams didn't have to get rid of malcontents, because Phil was able to control them, e.g. Dennis Rodman, JR Rider.
For anyone that argues for Pop because of his three rings, he would have to be second because of Phil's 9 rings.
Hard to overrate a coach that has three rings until you put go against your own rationale and put him above a coach who has nine plus another as a player.
Rings make a coach great? Well that will make George Siefert feel better.
Mike Ditka. DA BEARS!!
j/k
Pop, by a wide margin. His philosophy is part of the root of why I respect the Spurs, and think they are one of the few "genuine" teams in professional sports.
yes ducks, i think so too.
Maybe it is good change for the Spurs (start playing small ball more often) we will see it this seasson.
I think Duncan was like an assistant coach for the Spurs in tough times you know, he makes the decisions in tough games.. but Popovich has molded every other player into a defensive force.. but not Duncan he's a natural athlete
I think you gotta give it to the Little General. He out-coached Pop in the playoffs in what was his first full season as a coach! That's impressive.
False. The fact that none of Spurs' bigs were able to defend on Dirk has nothing to do with Avery or Pop.
Pretty ing hard for Spurs bigs to defend from the bench. Advantage AJ.
Well, one thing that Avery has done is transformed this team. They were a run and gun built team under Nelly, and they couldnt play a lick of defense, and then Avery turned this squad into a ball-control offense, and a very solid defensive team that went to the finals in less than 2 years. basically, he completely transformed a team. thats pretty amazing, especially considering he had no prior coaching experience, and was just thrown into the HC position because Nelly decided to quit, and to do it so quickly. not many coaches can do that, and do it as well as Avery has done. before Avery came around, everyone though Dirk was one of the worst defenders in the NBA. now after last year, hes considered (although not great or dominant or anything) vastly improved, and a very decent defender and rebounder. before, he used to just sit around. now he crashes the boards, hustles to get back on D, gets easy steals in the passing lanes, and can actually make good defensive plays on a consistent basis. of course, he still needs work, but he improved an awful lot in a short time, considering how bad he was.
they wouldnt have had any chance. he lit up everyone that defended him... even Bruce Bowen. if they had Nazr or Rasho defending Dirk, he would have averaged 40 ppg against the spurs.
Do you realize that you've quoted me to say the same thing that I've said ?
My point is that Spurs haven't lost because Avery has outcoached Pop but because Dirk has been a huge matchup nightmare for Spurs. Dirk has created this big missmatch because Spurs roster wasn't well balanced and because he is a damn good player.
Yeah Rasho would've man handled him.Pretty ing hard for Spurs bigs to defend from the bench. Advantage AJ.
Best coach in the league?
Hands down, Mike Woodson.
Anyone that can put up with being in Atlanta, with that ownership, and those players?
![]()
Having a shot blocker or two in the game might have been nice, considering most of the scoring at the rim was accomplished by guys under 6'6". Rasho stood a better chance of having Dirk go to the line to shoot 2 instead of to shoot one. , he and Nazr could hardly have done worse.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)