During WW II every telegraph message was intercepted and read, without a warrant. This was well known in certain circles including the press, but they did not publish it, because we were at war.
So don't talk as if this is something new and different, and we're "tossing away our freedoms".
It has never been necessary to get a warrant for everything. There are subtle legal points involved. No one wants to hear the details, they just want to scream "Warrantless Wiretapping!" It's simply become a political spin-cycle headline-grabber.
The "liberals" (or at least some of them) are EXACTLY trying to stop the Bush administration from "spying". They want the process to be slowed down, they want the process to be stopped depending on which judge happens to review it. They fundamentally believe we are waging some kind of imperialist occupation and they want it stopped, by any means necessary. This is just one of the means. Or, they fundamentally believe that it's more important for them to be in power than to tell the complete truth, thus the cynical news spins.

Reply With Quote