Reply With Quote
Apparently it was a serial number on one of the machines or something, and someone assumed it was a vote count.
People are stupid.
There were no disenfranchised voters in Florida in 2000. That's just partisan nonsense created to deceive the gullible such as yourself.
Apparently it was a serial number on one of the machines or something, and someone assumed it was a vote count.
People are stupid.
It's more than just one machine or polling place.
What about the fact that In 1986, former Assistant United States Attorney James Brosnahan (today a noted San Francisco trial attorney) testified - based on an investigation the Justice Department had dispatched him to conduct - that as a young Phoenix attorney, Justice William Rehnquist had been part of conservative Republicans' 1962 efforts to disqualify black and Hispanic voters who showed up to vote. Brosnahan's testimony was supported by no less than fourteen additional witnesses. Rehnquist nevertheless became Chief Justice - thanks to the continued support of conservative Republicans.
Why in the world would "anyone", be they Democrat or Republican, try to suppress poll watchers in the name of fairness. You tell me! All I know is that Democrats tried to do this very thing in the state of Ohio. They called it "intimidation" of the voters. WHY????????????
1986? Wtf.
So you have no proof. Thanks.
Not even 1986. 1962.1986? Wtf.
John Kennedy, Chicago ring any bells marzetti.
Vote counters eating chads making votes go to Gore.
Democratic lawyers filing lawsuits to disqualify millitary votes?
on and on and on....
You guys really do believe you don't stink.
lol,
wanna post a link johnny showing us where we said that????
What about in Florida, where the DNC, had busses of criminals being busssed to polling places, and bussing them out.
The other day, college students being aid 75 dollars an hour, to collect ballots at prisons, THIRD PARTY COLLECTORS, totally ILLEGAL.
"They called it "intimidation" of the voters. WHY????????????"
A black/poor/whatever person, under/un-educated, out of work, fringes of society, functionally illiterate, behind in rent and bills, standing in line to vote and is approached by 2 or more (the more the merrier) people, who stand very close to/surround the victim, and is asked to show IDs and answer who knows what questions, and very probably in the most aggressive, most intimidating presumption-of-guilt you- ing-cheater voice the multiple questioners can manage ("pour encourager les autres" within earshot). Blatant intimidation, blatantly effective.
The above characteristics, all or in part, of the intimiadatable victim probably applies to a 50% of the voters who show. But the real target intimidation is to scare voters away, from even showing up. Intimidators are self-selecting people who love bullying and are very good at it, augmented by the advanced techniques and gotcha questions they learn from the Repug organizers of the intimidation.
Did you see the pack of maddogs the Repugs ordered to assault the buildings where the 2000 vote recounts were being held? Numerous interviews with the re-counters showed they were seriously concerned, intimidiated by the hours-long cacaphony outside, and worried about the gamut of abuse they would suffer when leaving the building.
The Dems have deployed lawyers to try to prevent that this year.
No....but just not quite as bad as yours!
And to intimidate as well, I'm sure.The Dems have deployed lawyers to try to prevent that this year.
Without a doubt.And to intimidate as well, I'm sure.
Boutons and Marzetti,
what about the Moveon.Org thugsters out in Ohio, and other swing states, pressuring voters to vote democrat.
No comments on them as well Im sure.
A poll official notices a woman enter the voting area and move directly to the front of a 20 minute line. She asks the woman to please go to the back of the line, but the woman explains that she just wants to check and see if she is registered to vote in this precinct. The official points out that she still has to wait at the back of the line, because that's basically what the line is for. The woman ignores the official and walks up to one of the stations to get her registration card checked. The official walks over to one of the tables to grab another worker... and the two of them approach the woman to tell her once again that she needs to go to the back of the line. She stands her ground, refusing to wait in line simply to see if she is eligible. The officials are clearly frustrated and get very firm with her... until finally she concedes and goes to the back of the line.A black/poor/whatever person, under/un-educated, out of work, fringes of society, functionally illiterate, behind in rent and bills, standing in line to vote and is approached by 2 or more (the more the merrier) people, who stand very close to/surround the victim, and is asked to show IDs and answer who knows what questions, and very probably in the most aggressive, most intimidating presumption-of-guilt you- ing-cheater voice the multiple questioners can manage ("pour encourager les autres" within earshot). Blatant intimidation, blatantly effective.
Was this intimidation?
(By the way, she was black if that makes any difference.)
Give me an instance. And, no, Tom "Puff" Dashcle filing suit in federal court because he's afraid Republican poll workers are going to roll their eyes at the Indians doesn't count.
Well, Demoncrats certainly do. However, absent any evidence of Republican voter intimidation, I'd say Republicans never started in the first place.
You only have Algore to thank for this mess...
Really? Name an instance...
As well it should. But, what equally pisses me off is that Demoncrats are so quick to say, "Republicans are guilty of it too!," without any supporting evidence.
No, but they don't cheat in elections either.
'bout time.
You too, Joe.
I also find it interesting that no one is saying for whom the 2,000 votes were cast. It would say a lot about who perpetrated this sham, wouldn't it?
Nope. It was chaos prevention. What if the poll worker had allowed her to cut? How many others would have stampeded to the front just to "verify" their registration? This woman has had ample time and opportunity, in the days prior to election day, to validate her own voter registration, to locate her polling place, and to make sure all her t's were crossed and i's dotted befor charging to the front of the line, on election day, and demand the attention of an already on-edge poll worker just trying to keep the flow orderly.
It doesn't.
For what it's worth, I raised this as a hypothetical response to bouton's hypothetical scenario.
We know Spurm.
good scenario spurm.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
