Ironically enough, it didn't happen last year.
There is one major difference between Barry and Finley...
If Barry isn't scoring he won't hurt you with bad shots, and he'll usually find someone else in a position to score if he's handling the ball. This is what Barry can do...this is why the people that like him, like him.
Barry can pass, he can run the break and he can get guys easy baskets...he always has this skill(except for a brief stint against the Mavs when he choked).
Finley will shoot it like he's Jordan whether he has made a shot all night or not.
That's the main difference between them...and that's the reason one is given carte blanche to suck by Spurs fans and why the other one isn't.
I don't think there's anything admirable or ballzy about jacking up shots like you are an MVP when you can't hit the side of a barn...Spursfans think it means a player has balls and heart.
I'd just like to point out that we did win a le with Barry as basically our guard and SF back up rotation against a gritty and tough team while a 3rd of the team was injured...and we didn't with Finley against a softer and healthier team.
And I've never seen Barry miss a late shot to tie or win the game, or fail to make a winning pass in that situation...I haven't seen Finley do it yet.
Finley played well in big moments against the Mavs...but if you look, his shot was not there when we needed it most against the Mavs.
That's just my take...and I'm not saying Finley sucks because he doesn't...but neither does Barry, and Barry can do more when his shot isn't falling than Finley can.
Finley does one thing better than Barry..score. Barry is the better passer, shotoer and ball handler. I think he's also the better rebounder now as well(Tim Duncan and Horry are the only guys on our team that have pulled down more boards in a game than Barry). Neither one of them are going to make an All NBA D team.