Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 104
  1. #26
    keep asking questions George Gervin's Afro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    11,409
    Parker is now better, he has eva while kidd has a big headed kid and a y wife.
    well put in this context TP is better than Kidd

  2. #27
    9mm nkdlunch's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    11,497
    the wifebeater is still better but not by much

  3. #28
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    the wifebeater is still better but not by much
    better then not by much???

    kidd is superior to parker in every aspect of bball...besides rapping

  4. #29
    Complete player hitmanyr2k's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Post Count
    8,349
    Jason Kidd is so much better than Parker it's ridiculous that people even question it. He's what a point guard should be and more. You get the whole package from Kidd...leadership, scoring, court vision, rebounding (incredible for a PG), and defense. The guy is a triple double waiting to happen everytime he steps on the floor.

  5. #30
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    the only pg tony parkers game resembles is gilbert arenas, and his known as a chucker, and in this case parker could be referred as a floater.....hahahaha

  6. #31
    One Team, One Goal: 2007 NBA Champions!! shaggy17's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    320
    As awesome as Kidd is, I would never trade Parker for him. Kidd is a great full court player but he is in a slow half court game. Parker is a much better half court player then Kidd is. In terms of making players look better then what they really are, Kidd wins that hands down. He made Kmart a ing allstar and hes making RJ look like a star as well. Kidd is a superstar and Parker is not but could be down the line...we will see. I will say this though, anyone who thinks Parker is good ONLY because of Duncan is full of . He is a legitamte all star and a top 10 pg in this league. Parker is really that good and Kidd is really that GREAT!

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    1,487
    TP is 24 Kidd 33 end of story

  8. #33
    Banned
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Post Count
    2,321
    Kidd is not a wifebeater, he just married a

  9. #34
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    As awesome as Kidd is, I would never trade Parker for him. Kidd is a great full court player but he is in a slow half court game. Parker is a much better half court player then Kidd is. In terms of making players look better then what they really are, Kidd wins that hands down. He made Kmart a ing allstar and hes making RJ look like a star as well. Kidd is a superstar and Parker is not but could be down the line...we will see. I will say this though, anyone who thinks Parker is good ONLY because of Duncan is full of . He is a legitamte all star and a top 10 pg in this league. Parker is really that good and Kidd is really that GREAT!
    Couldn't agree more!

  10. #35
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    202
    parker - (duncan + ginobili) = no allstar

    remmeber how bad he played for his national team?

  11. #36
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Post Count
    1,487
    Remember how bad Duncan played for USA?

    But I agree that with another team, TP may not be an allstar. The same goes for Gino.

  12. #37
    Believe. ginobili fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    1,175
    Remember how bad Duncan played for USA?

    But I agree that with another team, TP may not be an allstar. The same goes for Gino.
    for the last years ok, but for this season and the level of parker ,you put him in the suns ,put a big fat man who can screen and then with his success at FG%,in the paint...and all the f***ing he can do and plus,his faaaaaasst,etc...and plus........ ========I think TP can really do something like 30points,10 assistts eaaaasilyyyy
    It should be so fun to watch,so fast and furious and so crazy

  13. #38
    Believe. RS189's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    129
    Only homers say parker is better than kidd, kidd is averaging like 14/8/8 and is a much better floor leader

  14. #39
    Thank you, Tim Duncan! peskypesky's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    8,747
    Both Kidd and Parker are playing great so far this season. The stats are there for all to see. Kidd's numbers, in particular, are SICK for a guy his age. Trying to decide who's "greater" is difficult because they're different players, with different games. Parker's a slasher and scorer first, then a passer. Kidd is a passer first, then a shooter. And that's what the stats reflect.

    If you want to decide which one is the better "point guard", then you pretty much still have to give Kidd the nod. He's a classic point guard. But if you broaden the question to "who's a greater asset to his team?", then I'd say they're even so far this season.

    Kidd has a veteran's experience, poise, and psychological resilience. Parker has the speed, quickness and finesse. Kidd has the court vision and passing skill. Parker has the, well, speed, quickness and finesse.

    Any team would be glad to have either of these elite players. If I were managing a team and had to choose one of these guys, it would be tough. Part of me would want Kidd, due to the experience, toughness and the ability to make his team-mates better. But the other part would want Parker for his scoring ability and his youth. The wear and tear of a long season might just tip the balance to Parker. Betting on 33-year-old, surgically-repaired knees is not something I'd have the guts for.

  15. #40
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    17,070
    better then not by much???

    kidd is superior to parker in every aspect of bball...besides rapping
    this could have been somewhat of a good joke, however, rapping has nothing to do with basketball. you lose at joking.

  16. #41
    we rang stretch's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    17,070
    I will say this though, anyone who thinks Parker is good ONLY because of Duncan is full of . He is a legitamte all star and a top 10 pg in this league. Parker is really that good and Kidd is really that GREAT!
    show us some reasons to believe that.

  17. #42
    Believe. ginobili fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    1,175
    Both Kidd and Parker are playing great so far this season. The stats are there for all to see. Kidd's numbers, in particular, are SICK for a guy his age. Trying to decide who's "greater" is difficult because they're different players, with different games. Parker's a slasher and scorer first, then a passer. Kidd is a passer first, then a shooter. And that's what the stats reflect.

    If you want to decide which one is the better "point guard", then you pretty much still have to give Kidd the nod. He's a classic point guard. But if you broaden the question to "who's a greater asset to his team?", then I'd say they're even so far this season.

    Kidd has a veteran's experience, poise, and psychological resilience. Parker has the speed, quickness and finesse. Kidd has the court vision and passing skill. Parker has the, well, speed, quickness and finesse.

    Any team would be glad to have either of these elite players. If I were managing a team and had to choose one of these guys, it would be tough. Part of me would want Kidd, due to the experience, toughness and the ability to make his team-mates better. But the other part would want Parker for his scoring ability and his youth. The wear and tear of a long season might just tip the balance to Parker. Betting on 33-year-old, surgically-repaired knees is not something I'd have the guts for.
    Completly agree!
    It's soooooo obvious

  18. #43
    Veteran v2freak's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    1,617
    Remember how bad Duncan played for USA?

    But I agree that with another team, TP may not be an allstar. The same goes for Gino.
    That would be a whole 'nother story.

    I'd say Kidd is better; he means everything to that team. But it's usually not a good idea to center a whole team around 1 player because if that player gets shut down..well..

    The Spurs work as a team and even teams like the Suns that rely on 1 player have many to fall back on. Jefferson's good, no, really good - but he can't do it all without Kidd

  19. #44
    Veteran ManuTim_best of Fwiendz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    8,897
    Remember how bad Duncan played for USA?

    But I agree that with another team, TP may not be an allstar. The same goes for Gino.
    Ignoring his last two weeks of subpar performances, I think given a larger role (over being the third option) that Ginobili's capable of doing fine on another team and could be considered an all-star. In fact he'd probably wouldn't be benched everytime he got hot. For the Argentine team he led them to Gold, this year he tried to get others involved and pulled his punches it seemed--eh he's a weird player because he's so self-less.

    So he could go either way if he were on another team, depending on what he felt was best for the team.

  20. #45
    Veteran ManuTim_best of Fwiendz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    8,897
    Kidd is better, but he is old now and his perimeter shot is kind of sketchy. Never the less, he still has bigger cajones than Parker.

  21. #46
    Ball Don't Lie Rip-Hamilton32's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,075
    kidd is way better then parker in almost every aspect anyone who thinks different is an idiot

  22. #47
    Veteran v2freak's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    1,617
    Ignoring his last two weeks of subpar performances, I think given a larger role (over being the third option) that Ginobili's capable of doing fine on another team and could be considered an all-star. In fact he'd probably wouldn't be benched everytime he got hot. For the Argentine team he led them to Gold, this year he tried to get others involved and pulled his punches it seemed--eh he's a weird player because he's so self-less.

    So he could go either way if he were on another team, depending on what he felt was best for the team.
    I would not venture so far as to say Ginobili is such a selfless player. I've noticed that he, understandably, seems to have a hero complex.

  23. #48
    Veteran ManuTim_best of Fwiendz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    8,897
    I would not venture so far as to say Ginobili is such a selfless player. I've noticed that he, understandably, seems to have a hero complex.
    You could be right. That's just a weakness on his part. Though I think he puts it on himself to try to will the game. Though he's done it so many times, where he's put us in a position to win so what's to complain?

    I still don't think it has much to do with the ego, as it does that he really just wants to win. Supposedly he was trying to win the All-Star Game. Eh, He's been putting in 100 percent effort since he was a rookie. He doesn't know how to fully pace himself still.

    He's a bit of a freak in that regard cuz he plays with a lot of passion that he himself can't contain at times.

  24. #49
    "Lets go Mavs!" Dirk Nowitzki's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    1,921
    kidd is way better then parker in almost every aspect anyone who thinks different is an idiot
    Except for a half court type of game.

  25. #50
    One Team, One Goal: 2007 NBA Champions!! shaggy17's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    320
    show us some reasons to believe that.
    Parkers progression over the years says alot about him. He came into the league as a 19 year old.

    His scoring,shooting,slashing,defense,toughness,passin g,basketball IQ, decision making, etc etc has dramatically improved every season. Yes I do agree Duncan helps take pressure off of Parker but he isnt the only reason why Parker has really improved as an overall player. Parker has worked his ass off to be this good. Duncan can only do so much in making Parker look good. The rest takes dedication and hard work. Either way if you think Parker is a complete scrub without Duncan, then you are just a hater.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •