I read this morning on TMZ that this story isn't even true. The first Lady's press secretary said Jenna is not dating the Argentinian and that the guy's claims were just "wishful thinking." See Dan - the takee was NOT interested in the taker!!!
I read this morning on TMZ that this story isn't even true. The first Lady's press secretary said Jenna is not dating the Argentinian and that the guy's claims were just "wishful thinking." See Dan - the takee was NOT interested in the taker!!!
Yeah, probably just casual sex. No serious relationship.![]()
But seriously, who gives a ? I think Dan starts threads like these to mess with you people and some of you like Crooky here take the bait... hook, line, and sinker baby.
I don't think Dan is that smart.
However, now that you've said this, I'm sure Dan will claim to have been doing just that.
Dan is smarter than you think.
No he's not.
My only wish is that guy's first name would be Enrico.
![]()
Enrico saved the Queen!!!!!!!!
Supposing I lacked the capability to think - you'd be wrong.
And I'd be a registered voter.
He might be . . .
But this thread is as lame as boutons' bashing that Republican's kid that was hugging a doll.
Chelsea was pretty scary looking though, but that's to be expected from Hillary spawn.
you forgot to add smeagol's existance.
Totally separate situations. One is a woman with no political position or independent celebrity who's being hounded by the paparazzi; the other was a child in a ridiculous costume who was being used as a prop by her politician father.
![]()
So you are saying it's ok to make fun of one but not the other?
Yes. The kid is fair game. The Bush twins are not.
Wasn't that the Bush twins campaigning for their father during the 04 elections? Normally I would concur that ridiculing family members could be a bit much, but the twins threw themselves into the fair game arena by campaigning for their father.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)