^ I gotta say you bring some enjoyment to my otherwise dull work day, flame on!
Hey weed, you can say on the website, not #*#*. Asshole
Counting what? How many hairs are on your ? Damn sure arent counting championships in this decade
spurs are not as old as people think. tim and manu and tony are still very young to carry a team....
Your SOFT SPURS can't even defend a le.
les this Decade
Lakers 3 in a row
Spurs 2 NOT Back to Back
Oh and Last game the Laker Show OWNED your SOFT SPURS.
OWNED!!!!!!!!![]()
Spurs are 4-4 against >.500 teams.
Not great but not bad when you consider that : Suns are 2-5, Mavs are 5-4, Rockets are 3-6, Lakers are 7-4 and Nuggets are 2-2 against >.500 teams.
16 rings...HOW MANY WERE WON WITH MAMBA AS THE CLEAR LEADER OF THE LAKERS?
Can't say now can you.
kobe sucks a$$, he cant win no damn ring w/o shaq around
kobe misses shaq
Last edited by jiggy; 12-22-2006 at 10:37 AM.
Really? The last few years it has been the opposite. Teams with the best record outright does not win the le.
2005-06 Miami Heat 52-30 5th in the League
2004-05 San Antonio Spurs 59-23 Tied for 2nd
2003-04 Detroit Pistons 54-28 6th in the league
2002-03 San Antonio 60-22 tied for 1st
2001-02 Los Angeles 58-24 tied for 2nd
2000-01 Los Angeles Lakers 56-26 tied for 2nd-
1999-2000 Los Angeles Lakers 67-15 1st in the league
Last edited by LakeShow; 12-22-2006 at 12:56 PM.
ES, you should really use some sarcasm emoticons for the newbies.
Oh my bad, that's what that was? I was like, wtf is he talking about.
![]()
So the Lakers used to be really good. So was Michael Jackson. Two completley different things there. Past success does not guarantee future success.
Anyway, as better as the Lakers are this year though, I still can't see them taking a 7 game series from the Spurs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)