I disagree. After Game 1 on Nov. 2nd, 2006 there was factual evidence that indicated the Spurs will win it all this season.
Game 2 on Nov. 4th, 2006 negated this.
![]()
The reason nobody's said it is because there's been no factual evidence on the court this year to back it up.
I disagree. After Game 1 on Nov. 2nd, 2006 there was factual evidence that indicated the Spurs will win it all this season.
Game 2 on Nov. 4th, 2006 negated this.
![]()
Garnett is an overhyped loser. No ing way I would trade Timmy for his sorry ass.
tim duncan better enjoy not makin all nba/defense teams or passing the first round this year........
I guess it really is different standards.
In the end, it's just sports. Yes, it's about talent, but it's also about luck. If a couple of breaks go one way or another, then the Spurs could have easily won anywhere from 0 to 5 or 6 in the Tim Duncan era. If another team beats you by a shot or two, it doesn't mean you underacheive. If you get completly blown out, however, then we have a different story, and even with our lineup today, with all of it's negatives, you're gonna have a of a time blowing out the Spurs. All I ask for my teams, in any sport, is to play hard, stay compe ive, and give yourself a chance to win. I guess all this makes me a really big pussy, huh? Oh well. Unless I control the game's outcome myself, there's no use to go into angst mode over one loss.
That went on a bit longer than I expected, didn't it?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)