Reply With Quote
Well, you'd be taking the high road if you stopped posting about me now, wouldn't you?
Ofcourse, you're so right.
And seeing how you are the better person, anybody else will find that you never respond to my words and you take the high road.
You have better things to do than post drivel, worthless arguments and 2000 post about people being obsessed with you.
Why waste your time here?
Well, you'd be taking the high road if you stopped posting about me now, wouldn't you?
No I wouldn't, i don't make such claims, you do.
Still waiting for you to put your money where your mouth is and not respond.
Many threads do end up revolving around you Chump. Mainly because you are usually the first to "throw stones".
I'm just saying.
Oh, and Bush sounded like a big pussy last night.
He is a pussy. He won't clean up his own mess. He'll leave it for the next tenant.
Must have been a trying to raise that little turd.
Is this the speech you guys are referring to?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070111/...wh/bush_text_1
I am trying to understand the context of your conversatin.
I've been on this board late at night (on the west coast, which makes it REALLY late for you guys) enough times to notice gtown's pattern of logging in and posting drive-by style replies to several different Chumper posts in several different threads.
I don't know a lot about miliitary strategy but it sounds like Bush is using the same old plan, just involving more people.Many listening tonight will ask why this effort will succeed when previous operations to secure Baghdad did not. Well, here are the differences: In earlier operations, Iraqi and American forces cleared many neighborhoods of terrorists and insurgents — but when our forces moved on to other targets, the killers returned. This time, we will have the force levels we need to hold the areas that have been cleared. In earlier operations, political and sectarian interference prevented Iraqi and American forces from going into neighborhoods that are home to those fueling the sectarian violence. This time, Iraqi and American forces will have a green light to enter these neighborhoods — and Prime Minister Maliki has pledged that political or sectarian interference will not be tolerated.
Surely the insurgents have reinforcements to send in as well. I am not convinced that his mode of operation is helpful.
Another concern, what assurance do we have that Minister Maliki will uphold his end of the bargain? Bush made it sound as if Maliki's cooperation vital to the success of the plan- what happens to our troops if the Minister doesn't come through?
Ok, so and then what?I have made it clear to the prime minister and Iraq's other leaders that America's commitment is not open-ended. If the Iraqi government does not follow through on its promises, it will lose the support of the American people — and it will lose the support of the Iraqi people.
Nah . . . Gtown would never do that . . .
It's a hail mary pass, Angel. But don't look for Flutie as quarterback. It doesn't address the turmoil between the different sects. Bush is concerned about Bush. British troops will be drawing down in 8 weeks. That's some coalition.
I wonder, would Iraq would be such a must win situation today if Bush hadn't by invading them?
Did Bush un necessarily aggrivate things in Iraq or are we just in the midst of the inevitable because were bound to seriously esclate anyway.
I really don't know anymore.
In the beginning ( seems so long ago, doesn't it?) I was against invading Iraq. I know the government caught Saddam but so far, that is the only thing I can really credit to the operation.
Bush has already admitted that it's about oil. He said they would use oil as extortion against us. (just more bull from a shamelessly dishonest leader). And no, if no invasion, Iran wouldn't have the stranglehold on the inevitible conclusion to this disaster.
angie,
Iraq was a mess under Saddam, but a stable mess. Ugly, tough for the Iraqi people, but stable and well down the list of threats to the US and M/E.
As the diplomats say, "kicking it (Iraq) down the road" (aka continuing the int'l lock-down on Iraq post-Gulf-War) was a perfectly acceptable tactic.
In the post-9/11 context, the US had much higher, more pressing, priorities and threats (Afghanistan, Pakistan FATAs, Iran, Syria, al-Qaida anywhere) than invading non-threatening, stable Iraq.
In a nuts , dubya's entire Hail-Mary plan for Iraq has always been and still is "Iraq stands up, dubya stands down". The fatal flaw is that there is no Iraq to stand up. No govt, no Army, no police that aren't compromised by Moktadr's Shia, death squads, informants, insurgents, etc, etc.
Maliki's recent plan had the US leaving Bagdad to fight on the perimeter, leaving Bagdad to Maliki (a Shia puppet of Moktadr who is the real power) to continue ethnic cleansing of Sunnis in Bagdad. That was transparent enough even for the WH dumb s to see through. The dubya Hail-Mary is exactly the opposite, MORE, not less, US military in Badgad.
dubya-in-chief has erroneously, incompetently, dishonestly, unnecessarily led the US military into an imprisoning, fatal quagmire. And he doesn't have a ing clue how to finish what he started.
So, would anybody rather have today the Iraq of Feb 03, or the actual Iraq of today?
you're doing a heckuva job, dubya
If I'm writing a letter to "Angie" I wouldn't close it by writing directly to "dubya".
That's just me though.
Thanks for your take Boutons.
If I'm writing a letter to "Angie" I wouldn't close it by writing directly to "dubya".
That's just me though.
Especially since her name is Veronica.
Especially since her name is Veronica.
I think it was a nickname for Angel.
I think it was a nickname for Angel.
Thank you Captain Obvious.
Just Captain. I think that explanation warrents me a promotion.
Just Captain. I think that explanation warrents me a promotion.
Once again, angel_luv proves that it's ing impossible to bother her.
"Thank you Captain Obvious."
IGNORED JS makes another brilliant contribution to the forum.
For someone that ignores me, he sure does quote me a lot.
Oh, and if I'm ignored, how would one know what kind of contributions I make to a forum?
This question is directed at anyone who doesn't have me on ignore.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions