No, I completely understand economics, I just don't agree that a raise in minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour is going to have a big affect on the national economy.
Then you don't understand economics.
No, I completely understand economics, I just don't agree that a raise in minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour is going to have a big affect on the national economy.
D'okie dokie. Then why did Pelosi protect the tuna industry?
Oh yeah, how many entry-level teen jobs, grocery sackers, stock persons, unskilled maintenance, etc... will now cost $2.10.
Trust me, a $2.10 mandatory raise will affect the price of groceries and other products where there is a high dependency on unskilled, minimum wage labor.
Last edited by Yonivore; 01-12-2007 at 11:22 AM.
I guess we'll see...
Using that logic, the only non-loser people with no "issues" that should be affected by a minimum wage increase would be the 16 year olds, or those brand new to the workforce.
But yes, IMO, being uneducated, unmotivated, and/or having a very low capacity to learn to advance your position is a big issue.
What you people fail to comprehend is that the vast majority of minimum wage earners are not people trying to support a family! They are KIDS, living with mommy and daddy. So those kids earning $2.10 an hour more are really going to help the economy? I guess they'll be buying more movie tickets, ipods, and sneakers!
I heard on the radio this morning that, even though Texas is considered a low-wage state, we still have a very small minority of minimum wage earners. The economist said the minimum wage hike would have very little, if any, impact on our economy.
Would it be so difficult to have an over-18 minimum wage and an under-18 minimum wage?
Nah, that makes too much sense!![]()
p.s it's a great idea though and I'm pretty sure it's been discussed.
Politicians want to hook em young.
Especially the Democrats. They just gave their (potentially) biggest voting demographic a $2 raise.
Gross markup in the grocery business is like 25% on average. Net margin is like 6%. Labor costs are probably a little over half the difference. So that's about 10% of the price of groceries.
If the 40% bump ripples through the entire labor force, that would mean a 4% rise in the cost of groceries.
For a family spending $150 a week of groceries, that works out to $6 a week, or $312 a year.
Now if it on average is say, a 25% bump, then the hit is $195 a year.
It's all fuzzy math to me.
It is about time the minimum wage is increased; it needs to start catching up to the cost of living.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)