Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38
  1. #26
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    I really don't understand why one would be against this.
    Then you don't understand economics.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Nuggets
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    12,134
    Then you don't understand economics.

    No, I completely understand economics, I just don't agree that a raise in minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour is going to have a big affect on the national economy.

  3. #28
    I don't really care... Yonivore's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Post Count
    26,781
    No, I completely understand economics, I just don't agree that a raise in minimum wage from $5.15 an hour to $7.25 an hour is going to have a big affect on the national economy.
    D'okie dokie. Then why did Pelosi protect the tuna industry?

    Oh yeah, how many entry-level teen jobs, grocery sackers, stock persons, unskilled maintenance, etc... will now cost $2.10.

    Trust me, a $2.10 mandatory raise will affect the price of groceries and other products where there is a high dependency on unskilled, minimum wage labor.
    Last edited by Yonivore; 01-12-2007 at 11:22 AM.

  4. #29
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    I guess we'll see...

  5. #30
    Mrs.Useruser666 SpursWoman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    27,175
    If someone has worked years to get to $7.00/hr, I'd say they have a lot bigger issues to deal with than payrate.

    Using that logic, the only non-loser people with no "issues" that should be affected by a minimum wage increase would be the 16 year olds, or those brand new to the workforce.

    But yes, IMO, being uneducated, unmotivated, and/or having a very low capacity to learn to advance your position is a big issue.

  6. #31
    They hate us - but they want to be us!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    6,140
    What you people fail to comprehend is that the vast majority of minimum wage earners are not people trying to support a family! They are KIDS, living with mommy and daddy. So those kids earning $2.10 an hour more are really going to help the economy? I guess they'll be buying more movie tickets, ipods, and sneakers!

    I heard on the radio this morning that, even though Texas is considered a low-wage state, we still have a very small minority of minimum wage earners. The economist said the minimum wage hike would have very little, if any, impact on our economy.

  7. #32
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Would it be so difficult to have an over-18 minimum wage and an under-18 minimum wage?

  8. #33
    They hate us - but they want to be us!
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Post Count
    6,140
    Would it be so difficult to have an over-18 minimum wage and an under-18 minimum wage?
    Nah, that makes too much sense!

    p.s it's a great idea though and I'm pretty sure it's been discussed.

  9. #34
    Displaced 101A's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    7,711
    Would it be so difficult to have an over-18 minimum wage and an under-18 minimum wage?

    Politicians want to hook em young.

  10. #35
    Live by what you Speak. DarkReign's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    10,571
    Politicians want to hoom em young.
    Especially the Democrats. They just gave their (potentially) biggest voting demographic a $2 raise.

  11. #36
    I Got Hops Extra Stout's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    13,614
    D'okie dokie. Then why did Pelosi protect the tuna industry?

    Oh yeah, how many entry-level teen jobs, grocery sackers, stock persons, unskilled maintenance, etc... will now cost $2.10.

    Trust me, a $2.10 mandatory raise will affect the price of groceries and other products where there is a high dependency on unskilled, minimum wage labor.
    Gross markup in the grocery business is like 25% on average. Net margin is like 6%. Labor costs are probably a little over half the difference. So that's about 10% of the price of groceries.

    If the 40% bump ripples through the entire labor force, that would mean a 4% rise in the cost of groceries.

    For a family spending $150 a week of groceries, that works out to $6 a week, or $312 a year.

    Now if it on average is say, a 25% bump, then the hit is $195 a year.

  12. #37
    Banned George W Bush's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    784
    Gross markup in the grocery business is like 25% on average. Net margin is like 6%. Labor costs are probably a little over half the difference. So that's about 10% of the price of groceries.

    If the 40% bump ripples through the entire labor force, that would mean a 4% rise in the cost of groceries.

    For a family spending $150 a week of groceries, that works out to $6 a week, or $312 a year.

    Now if it on average is say, a 25% bump, then the hit is $195 a year.

    It's all fuzzy math to me.

  13. #38
    God Talks To Me. angel_luv's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    24,451
    It is about time the minimum wage is increased; it needs to start catching up to the cost of living.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •