Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 50 of 50
  1. #26
    Casper Ghost Writer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,002,166
    T Park, first of all, Fish hit a two.

    Secondly, if Fish could catch, spin and shoot in that amount of time, he certainly could've been fouled first.

    Lastly, don't talk out of turn. I'm not the kid behind the counter at your local Taco Cabana.

  2. #27
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    The problem with your theory is that it doesn't take that long to catch and turn. The Lakers knew that whoever caught the rock had to go up with it immediately. With the defender immediately making contact suddenly the time left becomes less important. All that matters is that there is contact before time expires and that the player is in a shooting motion, not that he gets it off in time.

    Also you are assuming that whoever is guarding the man who catches the ball can wrap him up in time. Even if the man is there then you have Fisher catching the ball and going up with the shot immediately just as you want the defender to make contact.

    Again, act of shooting. 2 free shots at the line.

  3. #28
    Casper Ghost Writer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,002,166
    Your assumption that the player could be fouled in the act of shooting is as likely as the player getting fouled and not being able to twist around and get in the shooting motion.

    The bottom line is that you are convinced that nothing could've been done, while I believe something could've been done.

    Even though I don't think Fish ever gets to the line in SA, I'd rather him take 2 FTs with the SBC center going bananas than what actually happened to us.

  4. #29
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    You are asking for the impossible. You want the defender to be able to stay on top of him, yet not foul him before the ball is inbounded and then you want him to foul him before he is able to get into a shooting motion. That's basically impossible.

    Again, all Fisher would have needed to do is catch and turn into a shooting motion. Your defender fouls him and then the only question is whether or not there was contact before the shot. And of course there was because you told him to foul.

    This is pretty basic . You definitely avoid contact in that situation.

  5. #30
    Casper Ghost Writer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,002,166
    Nope.

    Fisher's shot was possible.

    Fouling him first with a foul to give was the thing to do, not take a chance by playing D and not fouling.

    There is no way the refs send a Laker to the line in that spot in SA anyway.

  6. #31
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    You forget where Fisher caught the ball. He caught it on his left, away from the defender. He definitely caught, turned, and released in one motion. Based on your argument the defender would have been fouling Fisher just as he had caught, turned, and was elevating. The defender would have been fouling him just as he was in a shooting motion.

    2 at the line. Game over.

  7. #32
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    There is no way the refs send a Laker to the line in that spot in SA anyway.
    :guffaw

  8. #33
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    You are also forgetting that the defender was not there at the moment that Fisher caught the ball. There was some distance to close and as the defender is closing then Fisher is going up with the ball. Defender makes contact before the horn, shooting foul called, and you just gave him 2 at the line instead of having to hit a shot with a high degree of difficulty.

    Again, standard NBA procedure in that situation is to avoid contact for precisely this reason. Figure it out.

  9. #34
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Did .4 Kill Ghost Writer?
    No, but I guess I did.

  10. #35
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    withdrew

  11. #36
    Hot Sauce Brodels's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Post Count
    2,601
    Nope.

    Fisher's shot was possible.

    Fouling him first with a foul to give was the thing to do, not take a chance by playing D and not fouling.

    There is no way the refs send a Laker to the line in that spot in SA anyway.
    That's insane. Their isn't a coach in the NBA, NBDL, or college basketball who would have asked his players to foul in a situation where avoiding fouls should be the primary goal.

    You always make a player convert a tough shot to beat you. You don't give it to him for free. With such a small amount of time on the clock, if the refs see the player even begin to turn to shoot they are going to blow the whistle if he is fouled.

    You've got this one wrong. It's as simple as that.

  12. #37
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    It's a tar baby argument that ties up valuable time and energy. There are hundreds of thousands of fans, players and coaches who would agree that you don't foul someone when it takes a continuous motion catch and shoot in order to count. Fish the Flopper, as he is known, has fooled refs for years and only the naive would think Fish couldn't flail his arms in a shooting motion, even if he wasn't allowed to catch it cleanly from a foul.

  13. #38
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Ghost doesn't get it.


  14. #39
    3-striped Laker Legend adidas11's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    2,448
    Ghost Writer vs. DogNazty, Part 3478927348748392.

    Actually, I'm going to agree with SpursFan on this one Ghost. You don't foul in that situation, you make the player attempt the impossible shot to beat you.

  15. #40
    Brazil GrandeDavid's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    6,207
    Ghost, welcome back from the other side! And best wishes to you and your fiance on your upcoming wedding.

  16. #41
    Casper Ghost Writer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,002,166
    Yeah, that worked out great, adidad. You're a Laker fan, right?

  17. #42
    Jesus Loves UT IcemanCometh's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    4,411
    You know what, Fisher made a ing great shot under a pressure situation. Kudos to him. His team then used that momentum to slap us silly. But you never fould him under that situation.

  18. #43
    Casper Ghost Writer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,002,166
    We had a foul to give.

    Did we win that series?

    Oh, wait... no.

    We let him get a shot off that cut our b@lls off.

  19. #44
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    How the do you foul somone not in the act with .4 seconds to play? He was in shooting motion as he caught the ball.

    Wake up.

  20. #45
    Jesus Loves UT IcemanCometh's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    4,411
    Pop made the decision not to foul, it was the correct one. Fisher made a tremendous shot. It's done with. Let it go

  21. #46
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    Did we win that series?
    The argument you're pushing is akin to "We lost the game by 8, so we should have launched halfcourt shots for the last minute of the game."

    Your schtick is tired.

  22. #47
    Casper Ghost Writer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,002,166
    Fish caught, spun and shot.

    You wake the F' up.

    And don't act like I am the only one sitting at home or in the stands that looked up and saw a foul to give and knew we'd somehow blow it.

  23. #48
    Jesus Loves UT IcemanCometh's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Post Count
    4,411
    The people sitting at home or in the stands are by and large morons who make knee jerk assumptions about a game and players. Kinda like you

  24. #49
    Casper Ghost Writer's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,002,166
    Dope.

    Your way failed.

    We were the Lakers' b1tches. Once again.

    Having afoul to give and not using it is like your dad leaving the condom in his wallet.

    Tragedy ensued.

  25. #50
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Damn you are a dumb .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •