Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 32 of 32
  1. #26
    Laker Lover 2Cleva's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    1,842
    That information is incorrect. Garnett can opt out AFTER next season. Not this summer. I'm 100% sure on that. Kori - you can IM me if you want details/source.

    Everyone put their pipes away for another year.

  2. #27
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    That information is incorrect. Garnett can opt out AFTER next season. Not this summer. I'm 100% sure on that. Kori - you can IM me if you want details/source.

    Everyone put their pipes away for another year.
    Speaking of pipes, you put yours down about the possibility of acquiring Kidd w/o surrenduring Bynum in the process? Looks like I called that one...

  3. #28
    Laker Lover 2Cleva's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    1,842
    Speaking of pipes, you put yours down about the possibility of acquiring Kidd w/o surrenduring Bynum in the process? Looks like I called that one...
    Bynum was never on the table. NJ knew that.

    The fact Bynum's name is coming up is likely because Thorn wants more from LA. From what I understand - LA, Kidd, and NJ owner Ratner has already signed off on a Kidd to LA deal without including Bynum. Thorn has decided not to go ahead with that deal and wants more.

    It could be he settles for Walton or another 1 pick and is trying to force LA's hand through the media. I don't know. But if Bynum was being demanded from the start, talks would have been over a month ago.

    This is a case of Thorn trying to get as much as possible at the 11th hour and hoping LA folds.

  4. #29
    Veteran AFBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    10,868
    Bynum was never on the table. NJ knew that.

    The fact Bynum's name is coming up is likely because Thorn wants more from LA. From what I understand - LA, Kidd, and NJ owner Ratner has already signed off on a Kidd to LA deal without including Bynum. Thorn has decided not to go ahead with that deal and wants more.

    It could be he settles for Walton or another 1 pick and is trying to force LA's hand through the media. I don't know. But if Bynum was being demanded from the start, talks would have been over a month ago.

    This is a case of Thorn trying to get as much as possible at the 11th hour and hoping LA folds.
    And it's your opinion that LA will not fold and will STILL get Kidd?

  5. #30
    What's the Word? Don Quixote's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    3,339
    Yeah, I'm so sure Garnett and Elson will coexist in the same locker room! After Elson outed KG as a in the playoffs a couple of years back.

    KG was probably thinking, "he's not supposed to tell anybody!!"

  6. #31
    Laker Lover 2Cleva's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    1,842
    And it's your opinion that LA will not fold and will STILL get Kidd?
    It was before. Again the talks have been ongoing for the past month and NJ knew Bynum wasn't any more available than Kobe was. No way the Buss family gives up Bynum. None.

    Thorn has hardened the past couple of days. Now, I doubt a deal gets done.

  7. #32
    Veteran romain.star's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    2,241
    ,IŽd do it in a heart beat.
    Jaric for Finley(I donŽt know if the numbers work though.)

    Jaric could have been an all star if.... he played better...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •