A question for Yoni about WMDs

[George Gervin's Afro]

Damn you are dumb as a doorknob. You cant even read.
Can you? Congress had all the intel Bush had. Bush
has his advisors, which he is not obligated to share with
anyone outside the administration, just as Congress
has aides that advise. Grow up and come talk to me
when you have something to add to a conversation.

Bush has advisors? Really ray? So you in fact you admit now that Bush had information that only his advisors saw but Congress did not. Kind of important to give Congress the whole picture wouldn't you think? Oh wait your a mindless kool aid drinker ... So then your admitting Congress did not have the same intel? Intel contradicting the intel he used to justify war? And your calling me dumb?

[xrayzebra]

Bush has advisors? Really ray? So you in fact you admit now that Bush had information that only his advisors saw but Congress did not. Kind of important to give Congress the whole picture wouldn't you think? Oh wait your a mindless kool aid drinker ... So then your admitting Congress did not have the same intel? Intel contradicting the intel he used to justify war? And your calling me dumb?

And so here folks is a liberals thoughts on government.
Bush advisors have access to information no one else has.
And he calls me mindless kool aid drinker.

And for GGA, no kool aid isn't my drink. Scotch with a
little water and a couple of ice cubes does me fine, thank
you!

[xrayzebra]

Chump, I refer you to post number 9 and 11 in reference to your
post. I have no "official" government laundry list. Okay.

[George Gervin's Afro]

And so here folks is a liberals thoughts on government.
Bush advisors have access to information no one else has.
And he calls me mindless kool aid drinker.

And for GGA, no kool aid isn't my drink. Scotch with a
little water and a couple of ice cubes does me fine, thank
you!

Well I don't know where you come from but taking a country to war is a pretty serious endeavor. So according to you now it's ok for the President to share intel , that contradicts what he says publicly,with his advisors but not with the PEOPLE? I always thought our govt was accountbale to the people but I guess in your world they ain't.

[ChumpDumper]

Chump, I refer you to post number 9 and 11 in reference to your
post. I have no "official" government laundry list. Okay.

Trying to discount the importance of the WMD claim doesn't change my question, but thanks for finally answering it.

You are not a coward like Yoni.

[xrayzebra]

Well I don't know where you come from but taking a country to war is a pretty serious endeavor. So according to you now it's ok for the President to share intel , that contradicts what he says publicly,with his advisors but not with the PEOPLE? I always thought our govt was accountbale to the people but I guess in your world they ain't.

Once again, you show you ignorance. Governments HAVE
ALWAYS put things out publicly that is contrary to the true
facts. Damn, you really do slow down a conversation. But
in this case Bush didn't. He re-stated what the previous
administrations views as given to him by the previous
administrations appointees, ie, Tenent. His advisors had
only the information given to them by the intel
community. They had no access to any other intel. They
gave Bush their views on that intel. Got it.

I really doubt it. Why? Cause you got a bone to
pick.

[xrayzebra]

Trying to discount the importance of the WMD claim doesn't change my question, but thanks for finally answering it.

You are not a coward like Yoni.

Well Chump, I will ask you a question. Do you discount
the accounts I gave you and if so on what basis? These
folks, who published the information, got it from some
source, more than likely government.

So do you discount their accounts. In the second case
it is an official government report, is it not?

[El_Tejano]

Chump, I refer you to post number 9 and 11 in reference to your
post. I have no "official" government laundry list. Okay.

FYI, I posted this in the "Cartoonist" thread, its a partial list, taken from a New York Times author's book, the rest of the info. is there.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1520691/posts

[ChumpDumper]

Well Chump, I will ask you a question. Do you discount
the accounts I gave you and if so on what basis? These
folks, who published the information, got it from some
source, more than likely government.

So do you discount their accounts. In the second case
it is an official government report, is it not?

I don't discount the Duelfer Report. Why should I? It says we found no WMDs.

If they were moved out of the country, the invasion is even more of a disaster than is already known.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Once again, you show you ignorance. Governments HAVE
ALWAYS put things out publicly that is contrary to the true
facts. Damn, you really do slow down a conversation. But
in this case Bush didn't. He re-stated what the previous
administrations views as given to him by the previous
administrations appointees, ie, Tenent. His advisors had
only the information given to them by the intel
community. They had no access to any other intel. They
gave Bush their views on that intel. Got it.

I really doubt it. Why? Cause you got a bone to
pick.

I'm glad you have proved my point. So Bush did not give Congress the refuted version of the Nuclear threat so by definition he didn't give them everything as you have said. Pretty important omission don't you think? However I guess for you it doesn't matter which is what I have been saying all along that you drink whatever Bush pours you.

[clambake]

No no, ray has deluted the definition of lie by replacing it with "contrary".

You are crafty!