"arguably" top 5. Nash, Kidd, Iverson, Arenas, Billups, Deron Williams ... are all "arguably" better than him
Past his peak at 29 ???, when PG are reaching their pick with maturity...
Kidd, Nash, Stockton were better players at 30 than before being 30.
Nagging injuries ??? How many games did TP miss the last 2 years....?
How many did miss Nash ? and he's still 2 times MVP...
![]()
"arguably" top 5. Nash, Kidd, Iverson, Arenas, Billups, Deron Williams ... are all "arguably" better than him
don;t really care about tony pff
well, I hope we can keep him for a reasonable price, but I would never want to give a 100 million dollar contract to keep a pg unless the PG is 6'9. Thats what is going rate will be since he'll only be in his late 20's and still young. If there is an available big man or bad ass swing man then thats who I hope we sign at that time.
I don't care.
Like who? Dwight Howard?![]()
I don't know about Tony being washed up by then (that's pretty stupid logic), but I don't see Eva being the star she is today at that age.
I don't think it's worth thinking ahead to 2011...4 years is a long time. Many, many things change over a period of time like 4 years.
Would signing him affect the 2013 plan?
You really hit the nail on the head there
I've heard it is easier to build around a big man rather than a guard, but by then Duncan will be gone and Ginobili's skills will have begun to fade.
32+4=36? But I guess a lot can happen in 4 years.
Parker wil be at his best in 2011,he would already have 6 les,6 time all-star,2 times final MVP,and he would only be 29.
Then he would be a legend,the youngest of the history.
Notice thet Nash became MVP at 33 and he will play until 36 or 37.
Then Parker will have a second carreer.It's frightning.
I hope he will play with the best to have 5 more les and beat Bill Russell
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)