Now they just need to quantify how much better a woman's pancakes have to be if she's an A-cup trying to compete with a D.
Money v. Looks?
See Moakler, Shanna
Now they just need to quantify how much better a woman's pancakes have to be if she's an A-cup trying to compete with a D.
"flaw-o-matic"
Anyone who thinks they can break down relationships to a science by processing criteria during three minutes worth of meaningless conversation better have some real money.
If superficial analysis of relationships were discounted, then Cosmopolitan, Essence, and Sixteen would all be out of business.
Not true ... I just found that my boss, who makes well into the 6 figures, has a profile on Match.com.
That just has unlimited possiblities. Too bad I like him a lot.
User's GM has one, too.![]()
![]()
This is exactly why I make my own money...so I didn't have to settle for the repulsive guy to be able to pay the mortgage.
That was good.The author should have included that having 8 or more inches can be used as a subs ute for $100K per year in income for men with average looks.![]()
Interesting article.
Personally, I've never really cared about how much money is in a guy's wallet (Well...unless he's absolutely broke and working at a BK). I prefer someone who's hard working and has ambitions compared to someone who has a lot of money.
As for height, I'll admit it, I've never really dated someone short just because I've never been attracted to them.
And finally as for looks...this is where I think the article is generalizing a bit too much. The survey was done based on people who do online dating or speed dating so it's very different. I've always been one of those people that though I may not think someone is "good looking" if they really have a great personality and show me that they can make me laugh and hold a conversation...that to me makes them more good looking. Things like that don't really come across through "online dating" or "speed dating."
To each her own. I'm sure guys have the different specifics for what they're looking for in a girl as well.
![]()
See? You just proved their theory wrong. Any girl will take you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)