Reply With Quote
My Team Is The Best The Rest!
this is the same guy that had in his sig a picture of Barry.
and it said
LET HIM PLAY
Look at the carney posting random bull completely unrelated to the topic at hand.
TPark: would you trade having Buckets on this team for Brent Barry? , Brent Barry AND Michael Finley. Because the combined salary of those two is more than what the difference in price from what we were paying Jax and what it would have taken to keep him.
My Team Is The Best The Rest!
You know I would.TPark: would you trade having Buckets on this team for Brent Barry? , Brent Barry AND Michael Finley. Because the combined salary of those two is more than what the difference in price from what we were paying Jax and what it would have taken to keep him.
I was for trading for Jackson when he became available.
It didn't happen.
Fegan ed around, and he decided to turn down the 3 year contract.
So thats in the past.
babbling about it now is pointless
Sj Played Better Then Manu And Barry Tonight
Jack's defense has always been pretty damn good, people seem to forget that.
I miss himOr at least a player on the Spurs like him...
What are your thoughts on the Rod Strickland pass?
Mav Killer
well we dont have stepehn jackson and never will...spurs could not afford him and manu and tony...get over him...hes a thug
hes not a thug.
Thats the bunchest bunch of bull i've ever heard.
Agreed.
Mav Killer
That's weak coming from you coach.
Oh, and by the way, Stephen Jackson's salary this year = 2 million dollars less than Barry and Finley's salaries combined.
Thanks for playing though.
jax is a walking turnover
Sure, very turnover prone when he was a Spur.
But he isn't the same player as back then. That is a pet hate of mine, when people still think a player is exactly the same as when he was a Spur.
His handles have improved, there still below average if he is playing SG, but they aren't nearly as bad as before.
He has huevos of steel, my friend.
ya but where would he fit into the spurs system now...he is not worth the money that u will eventually have to give him to keep him..hes not worth the investment
C'mon TPark, how is he not a thug? He went into the stands in the brawl, then there's the gun incident in Pacerland - ever since he left us his thugish tendencies have come out.
I love what SJax did as a Spur, but to pretend that he's a choirboy is absurd. That being said, if he'd opted to stay here, I think the veteran leadership around him might have kept him out of trouble.
Jax is crazy, but I will give him one thing-- he has a killer instinct. Not sure if any of the current Spurs have one.
Ducks, how about 05, 06?
U need to compare the two for the rest of the past years also.. I still think that Manu > SJax
He had one more than Manu or TP today. Yeah, that's pretty horrible. He also chipped in two steals and a block to cancel them out.
Um, I don't know, maybe the spot we're having to play 86 year old Michael Finley and a guy who is the definition of anti-clutch (Barry).
Not worth the money?
Salary this year: 6.1 million
next year: 6.6 million
2008 - 2009: 7.14 million
2009 - 2010: 7.7 million
Meanwhile
Brent + Finley: 8 million
next year: 8.6 million
But yeah, I guess I see your point, we'd be hosed in 2009
Who needs to win more les before Duncan gets old? Let's just pack it in, be happy with what we have, and let Holt Cat bank.
That's not the comparison that matters though.
Ultimately, it's Manu + Jax >>>> Manu + Barry + Finley
SJax wanted more than 10 million for 3 years. His agent couldn't get anything better. Sjax told the Spurs he'd take their offer but Pop said he had already decided to pursue another direction. That direction of course was Hedo Turkoglu. Ugh. We still could have had him for that weasly contract but Pop had a boner for Hedo at that moment and decided to continue his pursuit of the Turk.
Aggie, it's called give and take.. provided SJax didn't have any head cases when he was at San Antonio.. f
For a Spurs player, he is very volatile, considering that he went into the stands and shot someone in a club..
Do you think he can fit into Spurs clean culture in the long run? He has already been traded off Pacers' roster.. Do you honestly think that Spurs will keep him if he went into the stands/ shot someone in clubs while playing for the Spurs?
I don't even like to think about it anymore. At the bare minimum, the Spurs would have repeated in 2004 if they kept Jack.
Jack gambled that he could be worth more than $10 mil guaranteed in the short run and it took him a year but he was right.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
