Ignore Lists

[Nbadan]

With out Dan, where would this forum be?
If you want to ignore him then do so but don't come in here and try to change the forum.
I like variety.

Thank you Ms. McGillyCutty. We need more people like yourself with open minds in this forum.

[Nbadan]

ignore no one...and while Dan is a nutjob and terrorist sympathizer...I think it takes a lot of gaul(sic) to claim he is a problem in this forum...

I know he was taking a deep interest in this forum long before I was and it was the juicy and ample chance to destroy some of his many flawed views that first got me posting in here.

So no, I won't be ignoring Dan, even though I pretty much know the slant of every article he posts without having to read it...if the thread le of one of this threads looks too predictable I just won't click on the link.

Besides, the sun even shines on a dogs ass every once in a while...sooner or later he is bound to get lucky and hit a home run on one of his ridiculous conspiracy theories...and I kind of want to see that when it happens.

I ignore no one also. The main impedious for this whole forum is to get people with diffferent political phylosophies talking. If everyone is just blabbing while ignoring everyone else then we are no better than AM Talk radio and Fox News.

For instance, Whott has some pretty radical ideas, and if he wants to keep believing that he somehow got the best of me, even though I can't recall one argument where he proved conclusively that his 'opinion' was right over my own, then that is for Whott to believe. Who am I to burst his little bubble?

Forming political opinions of your own and taking the time to write them here is tiring, time consuming, and stressful unless you are a serious political junkie like myself. That's why I don't fault anyone for having a opinion that is different from mine.

What I can't stand is people who come in here with the same ole rhetorical political cliches that do little to add to the overall depth of the subject of the thread. If your gonna make a snide comment at least be original.

The forum is still young, and I never expected a rose party when I started this forum. I know eventually we'll get to where we want to be. We just have some bugs to work out. Thanks for your patience.

[Hook Dem]

I ignore no one also. The main impedious for this whole forum is to get people with diffferent political phylosophies talking. If everyone is just blabbing while ignoring everyone else then we are no better than AM Talk radio and Fox News.

For instance, Whott has some pretty radical ideas, and if he wants to keep believing that he somehow got the best of me, even though I can't recall one argument where he proved conclusively that his 'opinion' was right over my own, then that is for Whott to believe. Who am I to burst his little bubble?

Forming political opinions of your own and taking the time to write them here is tiring, time consuming, and stressful unless you are a serious political junkie like myself. That's why I don't fault anyone for having a opinion that is different from mine.

What I can't stand is people who come in here with the same ole rhetorical political cliches that do little to add to the overall depth of the subject of the thread. If your gonna make a snide comment at least be original.

The forum is still young, and I never expected a rose party when I started this forum. I know eventually we'll get to where we want to be. We just have some bugs to work out. Thanks for your patience.

Damn!!!!! An intellegent post from Dan. All things are possible. I wish I could believe you actually subscribe to what you posted but I won't get my hopes up. Anyway, congratulations to you.

[gophergeorge]

Dan reminds me of Tracy Bogert.... I didn't like him either....

[Useruser666]

Sometimes in order to feel better, people block out events in their past that hurt them. Like getting owned in a political forum. Dan, even you must admit that some of your threads are pretty much stretching it. You bring up good on topic posts sometimes, and some of your implosions are entertaining.

I just noticed something rather funny. Duff and Manny are spamming a NBAdan thread. Holy crap!!!

[spurster]

I think all we need to do is to nicely ask Danny to limit his new threads to say 3-5 a day on average.

You can't have a serious discussion if the whole 1st page changes every day. You will only get the few who check this forum every 5 minutes or so.

[Useruser666]

The thing I don't like about your posting Dan, is that you post a bunch of threads, then I respond to some of them, and since there are so many you don't even reply back till they're off the first page. You don't seem to finish what you started in the first place. You are Shock and Awing the rest of us.

[Nbadan]

News moves fast. You either stay on top of it or your already behind. Look, there are many issues to discuss and many are time sensitive. Meaning that if they aren't talked about then when they are hot, most people won't be interested later. Yes this forum moves fast and a lot of times I won't reply again in a thread unless there is a important point being made that I think warrants a response. So if you wanna debate then lets debate, but don't expect me to reply to ad havoc attacks and point-less rhetoric.

[Useruser666]

News moves fast. You either stay on top of it or your already behind. Look, there are many issues to discuss and many are time sensitive. Meaning that if they aren't talked about then when they are hot, most people won't be interested later. Yes this forum moves fast and a lot of times I won't reply again in a thread unless there is a important point being made that I think warrants a response. So if you wanna debate then lets debate, but don't expect me to reply to ad havoc attacks and point-less rhetoric.

Um, maybe to some your posts are......