Now, that 2007 Spurs won, are they the best version of the Spurs?

[Davidicus]

Id have to say 2007 is best for these reasons: Tim, tony, and many were all fully developed and playing like 3 all-stars (hey gino had 20-something points last night), bruce was absolutely amazing, we finally had a good smart filler in oberto, and our bench was great with fin, horry, barry, elson, etc. It seemed like we finally pulled all our pieces together right before we keel over and die of old age....(2008 here we come)

[anakha]

2009= Beno at his best??

God forbid.

[Switchman]

I cannot answer this question.

They would have had to played the Mavericks in the WCF. And would have had to played a good team in the finals.

[JMarkJohns]

I thought 2004-05 was. This teams wasn't tested near as much as that team. I understand the 04-05 team wasn't healthy for much, if not all of their run, but that only makes their accomplishment that much more impressive. Beating a defending champion in seven games of the Finals is much more impressive than sweeping the green/not very good Cavaliers.

This team was able to play a little better, but that team beat at least equal Western Conference teams, if not maybe a bit better, and defeated a much better Eastern foe.

Therefore I, as an impartial Suns fan, say that 04-05 was the best overall team, despite not being able to play up to their highest potential.