Looking at this realistically, in terms of the grand scheme of the NBA, this doesn't make sense for Boston. At. All.
You m ake a trade like that to win a championship. If you axe one of the best young players in the league AND a #5 pick in one of the deepest fields ever, you're essentially letting the ship sail on your long-term future in favor of winning now.
The problem? You might beat the east, but you are still not in the same league as the defending champs. No way that the Celts win a le against the West's loaded talent. A two-man combo with gaping holes in the rest of the team isn't enough to get it done today.
So in the short-term, this deal would be great for the NBA and for the Celts. We'd have a "compe ive" Finals and the Celts would emerge as a real power in the East. That would pull ratings up and get people excited about Bball in the northeast again. However, the Spurs and Mavs and perhaps even the Suns would dispatch the Celts in 6 at the most.
So short-term, great. But then Garnett starts to slide. The Celtics without Jefferson return to mediocrity at best. And the league suffers again.
Meanwhile, the T-Wolves wind up absolutely LOADED with talent to contend, and the West emerges as even stronger than it was before.
Oden, Durant, The Spurs, Jefferson, The Mavs, Suns, Rockets, Jazz..... we're looking at potentially the deepest conference in league history, especially if this deal goes down.
I just don't see it. The Celts would be idiotic to give up their future (no disrespect to KG). With PP and KG, where are you going to get money to sign other players?

Reply With Quote
