Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 31 of 31
  1. #26
    Ubuntu Tippecanoe's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Post Count
    1,959
    tough call to make. i still like the '99 team better

  2. #27
    Always waiting for the next game
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    590
    i remember a 53 win spurs beating the lakers in two games in the western conf finals (83).

    spurs: gervin, mitc , gilmore, moore, banks...
    lakers: jabbar, worthy, magic, nixon, wilkes, mcadoo...

    i think the current spurs could take them. of course there would be some fights. players were allowed to fight then and they didn't like being defended.

  3. #28
    Veteran dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    20,159
    tough call to make. i still like the '99 team better
    Not so sure Avery can't hold a candle to Parker. He was a good leader but always a mediocre player.

  4. #29
    Kori's nightmare SpurOutofTownFan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    4,381
    This is probably the 455th thread about this subject.

  5. #30
    Esse quam videri ploto's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    10,994
    This team is better than the 05 Spurs. How much better were the Nuggets this year than in 05? A load better. Suns leaps and bounds better. This team is just as deep and with Tony finally being great in the playoffs they are much better than in 05.
    Parker is better but the 2007 version of Manu comes nowhere close to the 2005 version. I think people forget just how amazing he was that year.

    The Detroit team of 2005 was way better than any other team the Spurs ever beat in the play-offs any time, any year.

    I also think that championships are- like Pop says- a combination of talent and luck. Other Spurs teams hit bad luck and even without an NBA le were actually a better team than the 2007 Spurs team was.

  6. #31
    Banned ArgSpursFan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    1,935
    Parker is better but the 2007 version of Manu comes nowhere close to the 2005 version. I think people forget just how amazing he was that year.

    The Detroit team of 2005 was way better than any other team the Spurs ever beat in the play-offs any time, any year.

    I also think that championships are- like Pop says- a combination of talent and luck. Other Spurs teams hit bad luck and even without an NBA le were actually a better team than the 2007 Spurs team was.
    I agree on that without luck you canīt win championships.
    Manu sure wasnt the same as 2005(and never will be again)as far as scoring,but He putted better numbers in rpg apg this year.So I would say that 05 manu and 07 manu would be a push.
    them Tony wasnīt even half a player He is now in 2005,and timmy Got to these playoffs in better shape tham in 2005.
    I think the 2007 is a more balanced team tham the 2005 team,but both teams are/were great.
    Oh,almost forgot,the 2007 team played small ball better tham the 2005 team.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •