Reply With Quote
Man, that was beautiful.
Was on FSC.
Man, that was beautiful.
Sunday, 24 June 2007, Soldier Field. Mexico will win 2-0.
Next time, perhaps.
what is fsc?
fox soccer channel.
It's a shame this was not on hi def. I don't know why fox sports has a hi def channel which is virtually unused.
And ing univision should get off it's ass and treat it's main sport with some respect and get it hi def.
Fox Soccer Channel.
Next victim:
Next victor:
Hate to bring this up but if USA beats Argentina it would be:
1990 World Cup: Cameroon beats Argetina 1-0 part II
just another upset.
Good game by USA in the 2nd half.
sloppy game by both teams....so many missed opportunities....the final should have been 4-3 going either way....
tim howard was a beast.....
USA's back defense is HORRIBLE...
some non calls in the box for both sides......
and were they playing in chicago or mexico city? spanish advertisements everywhere.....75% or more of the crowd was hispanic or mexican......AND IT WASN'T EVEN ON ESPN....what a joke
Was a great, highly tense, highly entertaining game...
To me that's all that matters...
Plus it was good to see that the game wasn't marred by fighting, or ejections....
Did they chant Osama, Osama like in LA?
Mexico is the futbol version of Dirk and the Mavs.
Talent but no balls. Shame.
USA USA USA USA USA USA
once again the sore losers do not exchange jerseys disrespecting the beautiful game( even matchs between Israel and muslim countries follow this tradition)...the lead taking goal placed in an untouchable location was breath taking! AND If anybody was robbed it was when mexico was seeding and US was placed in the group of death last summer.
Good luck against Argentina just saw their roster, ing badass team they have.Next victim:
What game did you watch?
At least 8 players swapped Jerseys... Much to the chagrin of an intellectually dishonest ESPN cast who reported the opposite.
yes, you beat Mexico, with your A squad... Argentina with your B squad?... yeah I don't think so buddyNext victim:
no offense bro, but USA wasn't in the group of death. The group of death was Holland, Argentina, Ivory Coast, and Serbia & Montenegro.
You do know Argentina went on the finals in that World Cup don't you? so really, I wouldn't mind another scenario like that
I just want to say I think its pretty lame that the US doesn't bring their best players to the America Cup. You get invited to participate in the most important international tournament of the Western hemisphere and you decide to use this invitation to field a team without Dempsey, Ching, Beasly, Bradley or even Donovan?
Last edited by MaNuMaNiAc; 06-25-2007 at 11:22 AM.
USA and Mexico have been known to not exchange jerseys at the end of the game. Like the above poster said, some players did exchange jerseys, like Salcido and Donovan.
so who won?
Yes, because soccer is so much like basketball. Anyways, Mexico have Carlos Salcido (champion with PSV in Dutch Eredivisie), Osorio and Pardo (champions with Stuttgart in Bundesliga), Rafa Marquez (last years Champions League winner with Barca and runner up in La Liga). Don't compare this team to the Mavericks because of one game alone.
And if you want to talk about balls, or lack thereof, refer to last years USA performance in Germany.
Had this tourney not come right after the Gold Cup I am sure they would have. And even thou the Copa America is a bigger tourney as far as the what the world is concerned about. And remember that the US has originally declined to go to the Copa America. The Gold Cup is what got the US into the most important Tourney before the World Cup the 2009 FIFA Confederations Cup. So that is why they had the "A" roster for the Gold Cup. Even if they had won the Copa America they would not of been able to get into the Confederations Cup.
Yes, especially the match against Italy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
