I don't believe Ray Allen or Paul Pierce are top ten players in the league. KG undoubtedly is. And, Pierce may be close. But, Ray Allen, while still very good, is not a top 10 player, in my opinion.
At any rate, Ray Allen does not command double teams. KG and Paul Pierce make a formidable 1-2 punch, and as a third option, Ray Allen is scary. And, that's great. To me, without depth, Boston is unquestionably better, but I don't see them as the team to beat in the East.
Double teams off of Rajon Rondo and Kendrick Perkins will result in what exactly? Will Rondo have a consistent jumper this year to make teams pay for doubling off of him? Will Kendrick Perkins all of a sudden become a solid midrange jumpshooting big man? And, you do realize more and more teams lean on different defensive zone looks when they have problems with individual players or get into foul trouble, right?
I would be foolish to say that Boston isn't better. Of course they are. All I'm saying is that it does not automatically mean they are the team to beat. I don't believe that at all.
There are teams like Detroit and New Jersey and Chicago that won't double any of those three players on Boston, and also have more depth and quality at the point guard and center positions to in response cause mismatch problems for the Celtics.
Now, if Danny Ainge is shrewd enough to get some quality cheaper players, then that might change my opinion.
But, right now, Boston's back up small forward is Brian Scalabrine. Their two point guards are currently Rajon Rondo and Gabe Pruitt. They have serious holes in the line-up.
And, both Allen and Pierce have had recent injury problems. If Pierce gets hurt for any stretch of games, who starts at small forward? Tony Allen? Leon Powe?
The depth is not bad. It is horrible.
Better, yes. The Eastern Conference team to beat? I'm not convinced.