Reply With Quote
if you're gonna hang on my nuts and post in everythread that i do, at least come with some better burns than that weak . otherwise, don't waste my time.
atxrocker and intelligent should never be mentioned in the same sentence again.
if you're gonna hang on my nuts and post in everythread that i do, at least come with some better burns than that weak . otherwise, don't waste my time.
Nobody's hanging on your nuts, so don't flatter yourself. When you post something so dumb, or if you're just trolling, then it's sufficient to just let your criticism of Dirk speak for itself.
Dirk is a forgain born player that never attended a NCAA school and has risin to the ranks of NBA MVP. Try to be a little less homistic.Your argument is full of holes.....first of all Dirk is NOT a HOF lock.....he hasnt really done yet.
Or they may have. Parker is top five at his position in the NBA today (Billups, Nash, Kidd, AI and Parker ... Where he ranks is up for debate), Manu is somewhere in the lower top ten at his position (Kobe, T-mac, Carter, Wade and Hamilton are the top five)Secondly, a team is about chemistry and who knows if other players besides Parker and Manu on the Spurs would have made a difference.....the other guys may not have meshed.
Duncan is the BEST PF in the game today. Maybe Parker and Manu are playing at the wrong time for their games (A lot of HOF caliber players at those positions are playing right now) and there shadows are too big, but as someone has pointed out, their careers are not over and it is likely that they will continue to show their stuff.
I think that Manu has a better chance at the Hall then Parker (International players are the wave of the future and he and Dirk are leading the way), but as of right now, if their careers ended, I think that only Duncan would get in ... Just my opinion.
Maybe you don't know what the topic is about and its just as likely that you didn't read my post at all.So, stop trying to talk about the Spurs and pump up anyone on the Mavericks.......we have 4 les.....the Mavericks???.......LMAO!!!!
How did I talk about the Spurs? And better yet, How did I pump up the Mavs .... I think in my opening post I stated that the Mavs shouldn't even be on the lists that were provided.
Try to read the posts before posting your crap about them
..........you belittle the Spurs accomplishments and make Dirk seem like a god.....dude is a loser so far.
The Jordan,Pippen Kukoc or Jordan,Pippen Rodman trios kicked ass too.
as far as the spurs big three,we don´t know yet.The have won 3 les together so far,and they´re are capable to win a couple more before one or two of them retires.
I would say
1:Bird,Mchale,Parish
2:Magic,kareem,Worthy
3:tied right now.Spurs big three and Bulls big three(MJ,Pip and Rodman)
As much of a homer as i am, i really hate how some spurs fans have such a large chip on their shoulder. You happen to mention the spurs in a sentence that may question where they stand in greatness or just offer an opposing view, and all of the sudden you are "belittling the spurs!" and "not giving them their credit!!" etc...
My wife acts like this sometimes...during the playoffs "i hate nash, he isnt even that good at basketball!!" wtf...he is one of the best, if not the best at his position...dont just say because he is beating or threatening your team...lets be real here...I may hate him at the time, because he is so hard to deal with, and on occasion has really stuck a knife in what would have otherwise been a smooth win for the spurs...but to say he sucks...is so far from the truth its crazy...
I agree, i dont think Tim, tony and manu belong in this conversation. I believe Tim is the best power forward to play basketball in the NBA. I believe the TEAM as a whole contributes much more than any "big three" it is a team concept of defense and offense that makes this team go. Manu and Tony are just very very strong roleplayers who are capable of having breakout games when necessary. On another team they may be considered the starring attraction, but here the team is the starring attraction with tim duncan providing the pivot point for the rest of the squad.
Get the chip off your shoulder lebomb...we know we are good, most other people know this too, because they aren't looking at it through silver and black shades, doesn't make it any less valid.
Who cares where they rank? They bring us the championships thats all that matters. And I bet they got at least 1 left in their tank. Maybe 2. We'll see.
No way in are the Spurs big three even comparable the Bulls big three. Duncan is a great big man, while Ginobili and Parker are good players too. But MJ is the greatest player of all time, all three of those guys can lock players up defensively, while NONE of the Spurs big three can just lock someone down (Duncan has great defense, but he can't lock people up the way Jordan, Pippen, and Rodman could). Rodman would fluster the out of Duncan, Pip and Jordan would have Ginobili and Parker locked down as well. Plus, the Bulls 3 were able to three-peat. Spurs have never even repeated.
No comparison whatsoever.
I think its pointless to compare players of one era to another era. Nobody knows how it would of turned out. All you have is your OPINION of what might of happened. All that matters is that this current big 3 and the Spurs are dominating this era. When it comes to this era, no big 3 can hold a candle to Tim and tony and Manu, because they have been winning numerous championships together. Not Dallas, not Phoenix, no one.
I think its pointless to compare players of one era to another era. Nobody knows how it would of turned out. All you have is your OPINION of what might of happened. All that matters is that this current big 3 and the Spurs are dominating this era. When it comes to this era, no big 3 can hold a candle to Tim and tony and Manu, because they have been winning numerous championships together. Not Dallas, not Phoenix, no one.
Its not the "big three" that are winning anything, it is a team oriented squad that is winning championships. Everyone on this team plays a very vital role and each person is capable of filling their niche when called upon. No other team in the NBA has this right now. Every other team has a "big three" or "big two" or "Big one" but no one can match the spurs team ball. That is why we win championships. Without finley and barry and horry....tony doesnt get open lanes to drive into, without tony driving into those open lanes, finley barry and horry don't get open looks at three pointers. Without tim drawing doubleteams, manu doesn't get open runs at the hoop, without manu being a threat, tim has 2 people on him constantly limiting his effectiveness...its all around team ball.
So you honestly think a trio of Manu, Parker, and Duncan is equal to, or better than a trio of Jordan, Pippen, and Rodman? (whom has accomplished more and all won more les than any of the Spurs big 3)
I think its pointless to compare players of one era to another era. Nobody knows how it would of turned out. All you have is your OPINION of what might of happened. All that matters is that this current big 3 and the Spurs are dominating this era. When it comes to this era, no big 3 can hold a candle to Tim and tony and Manu, because they have been winning numerous championships together. Not Dallas, not Phoenix, no one.
You are insane.
Great post.
Oden-Aldridge-Roy = Best Big 3 of ALL TIME!
Did I say that? No you need to learn to read I guess. I said its pointless to compare players of different era, and all that matters it that the Spurs big 3 of Manu and Tony and Tim dominating this era.
As today maybe the spurs big 3 hasn´t repeated yet.That´s why I said we or I don´t know yet,coze the spurs big three will be able to win a couple more le hopefully before one or two of them retires.
So as today,yes,the Bulls big 3 >spurs big 3.....
But just as today only,we´ll see what happens in the future
Okay, but you also said that no one knows what would have happened. Well be honest. If you look at the matchups, do you seriously think that the Spurs big 3 is that close of a comparison to the Bulls big three?
No. They aren't. The Spurs have superior role players to the Bulls, which is why they are about to make a run at their 5th le.
Jordan Pippen and Rodman/Grant was possibly the best 1-2-3 combo of all time, simply because the 1-2 part of it featured the GoaT (perhaps in any sport in history) and another Top 50 player who was absolutely fantastic in all areas of the game. With Rodman, they had 3 of the 5 best defenders in the NBA on their team. It's hard to argue with that.
However, the Spurs current team would present matchup fits for ANY team in NBA history. Parker is simply unguardable, few PGs, if any, would have the lateral footspeed to stay with him from a pick. He's among the very fastest players the NBA has ever seen. Manu has some of the best hustle plays and intangibles of any player in the league (and is very underrated on D), and Duncan is just too fundamental to be shut down these days. He'd frustrate the out of Rodman and get him in foul trouble by the end of the 1st quarter. The Bulls would likely resort to doubling -- and the high IQ of their basketball players would strain Duncan like he's never been pushed before to make perfect passes. Not to say he couldn't do it, but Jordan had such good senses that he'd definitely pick off some passes.
Again, I think the Bulls are better. But I think the Spurs are severely underrated because a lot of fans are just hesitant to give them any credit due to the lack of a show-stopping superstar. Defense is so quickly and quietly forgotten when thinking about what makes a team great.
Dirk, Howard, Terry> Dirk, Nash, Finley
Ok, that is fine and all that you put so much thought into a post that is probably true. But did you look at the subject of this thread? We are talking about the BIG THREE. Not the entire team. In terms of the best three man combinations, I said that it is crazy to compare the Spurs big 3 to the Bulls big 3. No where did i compare the teams.
What he said....
I would pick the Bulls big 3 over the Spurs, but come on the Tim Duncan and Manu and Tony are no pushovers. You make it seem like they couldn't even compete.
Considering the lower tier big three mentioned, you almost have to include:
Malone Stockton Hornacek
2 finals, 1 good coach away from a le.
Quick Observation:
The Basketball Hall of Fame is for all of basketball, not just the NBA. Considering his role on the Argentine 2004 Olympic team and championships in multiple professional leagues, I would argue that Ginobili is already a lock for the HoF. Isn't Drazen Petrovic in the HoF?
That's debatable. Utah only lost 3 of those games by a combined total of 8 points. They may not have had finals experience, but they were playoff tested over the years even if previous results weren't in their favor.
Utah could've easily won those three games had they executed down the stretch. We'll never know how Houston would've done in similiar cir stances. Remember, it was their failure to execute down the stretch that cost them in their game 6 loss to Utah in the '97 WCF.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions