Reply With Quote
you mean the "good man caved in" to the dimmocraps by becoming a quitter?
he bailed on you because he couldn't stand up to dimmocraps?
who else caved in? foley? haggard? rummy? snow? rover?
bush accepted his resignation? why?
Help me out here, x -- in what way was Gonzales "good" and how did liberals "ruin" him?
you mean the "good man caved in" to the dimmocraps by becoming a quitter?
he bailed on you because he couldn't stand up to dimmocraps?
who else caved in? foley? haggard? rummy? snow? rover?
bush accepted his resignation? why?
he's a cut-n-runner.. coward
clarification, rather political science calss 101 for Ray
Before you go and blame all 'dimmocraps' for kennedy and Frank, you should blame the people who voted for them.. not people here on spurstalk and the rest of the democrats.
now back to the cowardly cut-n-runner gonzales..he is an embarrassment
So, Yoni, what do think about the "fishing expedition" now?
The board neocons have been total pussies since last November.
Yoni has been MIA for a while now...probably busy re-arming himself for the next "Surge of good news", or perhaps he's bravely serving his country by volunteering for the Romney campaing.
he's going to link us (ha ha) to a story about iraqis in a swimming pool and the overall success of democracy in baghdad.
Well, my take of the resignation is simply that he cannot do his job any longer. Republicans tend to do that. Stand down when they can no longer be effective. It is not a sign or weakness, or quitting, to stand down so someone who can be effective can stand up. It's a sign of charactor.
To date, nobody can show he did anything wrong. Just shows how good the left propaganda machine is.
But if he did nothing wrong, why can't he be effective?
taken down by propaganda. what a weakling. i was hoping these republicans had a backbone afterall.
beaten by their own yellowbelly?
If I remember correctly, everyone on the Judiciary committee hated him. Especially Arlen Specter. Gonzalez was a up and everyone knew it.
No way to spin this into liberal propaganda. It was clearly a bipartisan push.
Because he has to spend so much time defending himself, he cannot do his job.
I though such things were obvious?
I would appreciate hearing your own thoughts on this, but it would be nice if your examples were a little more relevent--or at least from this millenium!!!
I believe the official count for how many times he said "I have no recollection" during one Senate Committee interview was 78.
78 times he said, "I cant remember". 78 times.
Why does he have to defend himself if he did nothing wrong? How many hours is he spending defending himself?
I can't believe he actually used up that much time since he used the same speech whenever he testified before congress.
as attorney general he was a joke.
remember....against the assault of laughter, nothing can stand.
"The reality is that your characterization of your participation is just significantly, if not totally, at variance with the facts."
-- noted Democratic propagandist Republican Senator Arlen Specter on Gonzales' testimony
I didn't follow those things, but if I recall correctly, Specter is a moderate to left leaning republican anyway.
If everyone knew it, how did he get confirmed?
I see that as an unsubstatiated opinion. If you really review some of Gonzalas' court opinions as a judge, you might think otherwise.
Yes, it was bipartisan. Republicans do push their own out when the controversy gets unmanageable. This keeps the fire going for democrats to do it over and over as well. Besides, elections are coming soon and people are afraid of being associated with those who are getting bad press coverage.
it's nicer than saying "you're a liar".
remember...Mild Coma said it was the propaganda machine, only.
Ain't that the truthI didn't follow those thingshttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...902935_pf.htmlbut if I recall correctly, Specter is a moderate to left leaning republican anyway.
Graham is a well-known commie.
One rises to the level of one's incompetence. No one could predict he simply wouldn't know what was occurring in his department or lie about not knowing it.If everyone knew it, how did he get confirmed?
What was in it for Specter? Graham?Republicans do push their own out when the controversy gets unmanageable.
Ray, you have provided an excellent example of the blinders that party members on this board(and in this country) wear, republican and democrats alike. When someone in your own party screws up, it is forgivable. when the other party does it, unforgivable.
Now that intrigues me -- what specifically about "Gonzalas' court opinions as a judge" (as opposed to court opinions as a spectator?) would make someone think that he was particularly qualified to serve as Attorney General? I sure didn't think he was.
I'll admit, though, that I'm relieved to know that we can be sure that Alberto Gonzales will never sit on the Supreme Court of the United States. I'm absolutely sure that there was nothing in his "court opinions as a judge" that demonstrated any real qualification for that job.
Last edited by FromWayDowntown; 08-27-2007 at 05:41 PM.
if you don't think the pegs are falling off this administration now there's something really, really wrong with you....
Next?
Just the same old junk from the dimms. Politics of destruction
of anyone they think stops them from regaining power.
You think Gonzales got raked over the coals. Watch what happens
on the new nominee. Guess they can call in their number one
mud slinger, Larry Flynn.
Same old story. Just a new chapter.
Chapter 1 -- The Clinton Impeachment.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
