Reply With Quote
A lot more from her than from you. But again, that is no
compliment to Ann, since you aren't much of a challenge.
Coulter? What serious political discourse do you get from him?
A lot more from her than from you. But again, that is no
compliment to Ann, since you aren't much of a challenge.
Please, give me an example of his serious political discourse.
When you get serious, I will to. Otherwise, keep your sexual
innuendo crap out of the forum. It is typical of you and others to
attack the person not the message.
I throw it back to you. Where has she been wrong. Just being
a conservative is not being wrong.
Kind of like the left has jumped onto global warming?
I dunno man. I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for the genius program Hillary hopes to implement next week.
I'd have no problem voting for a woman. No problem voting for a black person. No problem voting for a democrat, depending on the cirumstances. But some of the stuff she talks about really scares me.
Make the people dependant on you and you will stay in office I guess.
Last edited by Walter Craparita; 10-05-2007 at 03:30 PM.
I am serious. What serious political discourse have you received from Ann Coulter?When you get serious, I will to.I don't have any opinion about Coulter's sexuality. I just think he's a man. Seriously.Otherwise, keep your sexual
innuendo crap out of the forum.
You have a problem then.
I'm with ray here.
I don't want to see him whip it out!!
Penis fetish. How do you handle that when you go
to a public rest room. Do you use the men's restroom,
right?
I think fact, in the context in which WC uses the word, means she says stuff WC agrees with.
Not really. It will probably never be proven definitively either way. I am content to let the mystery be.
ask larry
Yes, dimm-o-crap is solidly about message and not the person.
Interesting argument strategy, too -- refuse to answer a question and then ask someone to disprove something that you never bothered to prove.
And you point being? Sarcasm? Fact? I fail to see
the point you are trying to make.
That's somehow unsurprising.
You said to ChumpDumper:
Et tu, xray?
When you refer to Dimm-o-craps, aren't you attacking the person as well? You seem to indicate in the above-quoted language that attacking the person is somehow unseemly in discussing politics; but why is it okay for you to attack the person and not for those who have a different view than yours?
I don't know that Coulter has a message to attack -- his statements are so hyperbolic I can't take them seriously.
Well, there is that. . . . .
Are there any rational Republicans left?
ron paul
I point out the idiocy of the dimm-o-crap philosophy.
So I suppose you are correct in the sense that if you
want to discuss the point of view where they are wrong
then I have attacked the person. I, seldom, attack a person
on the personal level. I do sometime proffer some
remarks about their reasoning capability. But
sexual orientation or preference is not my style.
I, seldom, attack a person
on the personal level.
So, you don't attack on a personal level except when you attack on a personal level?
Gotcha.
I'm not saying that only comments or allusions concerning a person's sexual orientation are personal attack. I'm saying that deliberately and repeatedly calling people names -- the thing that you've objected to about Coulter -- is the very sort of personal attack that you called out ChumpDumper for undertaking. Hypocritical much?
Forget Coulter, if you would like to look at the science here, instead of just going along with the leftist crowd, get a copy of Dr. John Lott's book "Freedomnomics." There's a chapter there on voting ... it will open your eyes. Here's your link if you want to order the book. I enjoyed it immensely.
Using partisan, half-baked theories to justify sexism and misogyny...hilarious.
The problem is, these are statistically tested facts! Before the 19th amendment was passed, which states:
.The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation
Several states passed legislation allowing women to vote before this. One by one, in order, historical do ents show that social spending increased in line with the law allowing women to vote. Women are more emotional than men. That is why as more women started voting, social spending increased.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
