Better PG: Manu or Parker

[We born to be bad]

you need to stay on topic

Sorry, but the stupid thread needs stupid post

[Hemotivo]

did not tp win finals mvp and you want to replace him now with somone else
why

I don't want to replace him.
Only when TP is injured or tired.

Manu because of his high basketball IQ can handle the point.
Plus there's Barry

[sa_kid20]

yes aas a backup manu is ok at point
but not your starter

yeah i agree obviously tony will be the starting pg i'm just saying it might not be a bad idea to use Manu at point from time to time considering the back-up pg situation

[ducks]

Lol

[WalterBenitez]

no he can not
because he can not handle the starting point guard minutes

"According to POP"

[xamila rey]

i think Manus role is well defined,
i dont like the idea of him as a pg.
that takes energy away from him.

[Spurs Dynasty 21]

Pop hates playing Manu at point guard and doesn't think he's that great at it at all.

But good job starting another troll thread so early in the preseason.

this is not a troll thread, facts and logic were presented



and I'm not hating on anyone



don't be so quick to judge

[Oh, Gee!!]

Parker (but barely)

[nkdlunch]

Seriously, Parker is a great PG. he is not a typical PG, where he would Pass first.

He is a shooting/penetrating PG that will take a lot of attention from the opposing defense and he is unstoppable ever since he developed consistent shot and clutchness. This is why he is top 5 PG in the league.

I know some ppl critizize him for not passing first, but they need to open their eyes and see that still he is top 5 PG in the league.

that being said, Manu is not too shabby of a PG. his strength is that he gets teammates involved more. but that is not his natural position, he is best as a SG

[Mark in Austin]

this is not a troll thread, facts and logic were presented

You presented facts, but explain to me how comparing one player's numbers in a meaningless preseason game with another's season long average is in any way logical.

That's even dumber than saying Bonner had more points and rebounds than Duncan last night, so therefore Bonner is a better power forward.

[spursfan09]

TP is not a traditional point guard, But he's young, can score alot of points in diff ways and he almost is always the fastest player in the game. I think TP is the better pg, and will eventually be considered the better NBA player than Manu. Kind of already is actually. But I know Manu was older and his game affects more than the stat sheet. So I'm am not at all trying to downplay Manu's importance to the Spurs.

[anakha]

Sorry, but the stupid thread needs stupid post

Truer words were never spoken.

[td4mvp21]

Uh Parker????????????

[anakha]

this is not a troll thread, facts and logic were presented



and I'm not hating on anyone



don't be so quick to judge

She was looking for human logic, not dumbass homer logic.

And you don't consider yourself a troll? Wow, someone's in denial.

[RC's Boss]

Someone close this for real!

[SpursIndonesia]

I think Manu's court vision is superior than Tony's, but Tony's ballhandling ability and court penetration is better, making him a more steady playmaker or pace controller than Manu. Since the Spurs system doesn't require the PG spot to be the ultimate source of playmaking ability, Tony's perfect within our system, so is Manu. They're complimenting each other.

[Scola Trade]

WTF is this thread about?
Better PG: Parker
Better SG: Manu
PERIOD

[SRJ]

Hey, remember that the thread starter was Spurs Dynasty 21; Let's all be grateful it wasn't another thread about trading a certain Argentine forward.

Good job!