Reply With Quote
I call dibs on "Wild Cobra Commander".
Important enough to bring it up and disparage the work of the ISG, including the DIA and Australians.It's not that important to me anyway.
Again, why did you intimate all of them were lying about the amount of yellacake?
I call dibs on "Wild Cobra Commander".
You are all begging to be me...
crickets..pin dropping..
I never said they were lying about the amount. The report was an account of known material. I was showing there was more than what was known about. That amount appears to be in error, but it might still be right. Other reports do put the yellowcake at 500 tons and 550 tons. The 500 could be a rounded figure, but if the 550 has validity, there is some that was unaccounted for by the ASG!
I am sick and tired of explaining such simple concepts to you, especially when you fail to answer my pointed questions. When will you stop being a jack-ass?
Care to go back and answer mine?
Didn’t think so. Because you cannot and you refuse to admit you are wrong.
You too. You refuse to answer pointed question at times.
Think of yourself with that pin...
You throw out your "fact" that we found more than 2,000 tons and insinuate the ISG group didn't do a good job because they missed 1,500 tons of it.
Why did you do that?
And what are you even asking me to answer?
You ASSume way too much.
I never said or implied what you say I did.
I don't remember at the moment and don't have the time to find it. If I do, will you answer? There have been at least two, probably more times which you claimed you already answered be, but you didn't. When I asked you to point out where, you never did!
I’m not even going to bother finding it if you don’t say you will answer. Why waste the time?
Of course you did.I never said or implied what you say I did.
ISG: 500 tons
Wil Cobra: 2000 tonsI don't remember at the moment and don't have the time to find it.
"Why won't you answer my question that I can't even remember?!!!"
Wild Cobra's self-aggrandizing efforts at relying upon "facts" that have been concocted, his claims that context matters only when a conservative is caught in a potentially-misconstrued statement, and his ongoing claims to hold some intellectually superior position over those who take the time to discount his position actually make me long for the days of Yonivore's plaigarism of conservative blogs.
He works on a level an Ivy League educat-- I mean indoctrinated lawyer could just not understand.
I bet you only have one "+" after your intelligence rating. Two, tops.
You got me there -- I don't even know that I have an intelligence rating.
I do find his intellect to be truly dizzying.
I already explained the 2000 possible error, so I though you were intelligent enough to know I meant the remark where you said I insinuated!I never said or implied what you say I did.
Excuse me for not being specific. When you said:
that is what I was refering to.
My bad. I gave you credit for more intelligence than you have.
How can you be such an asshole after I admitted to an error? I cannot factually support the 2000 number and I admitted to that.
I guess I should take that as a complement if that's all you guys can at me about. That and the ways you guys can intentionally misconstrue my statements.
Yes, thanks for rehashing your argument that the ISG missed or lied about 1500 tons of yellowcake. One still has to wonder exactly why you would call their work and/or integrity into question at all based on something you thought you read somewhere. This is what I was asking about.
When you dispute the final report of the ISG regarding yellowcake, you are saying one or both of two things:
1) the ISG did a very bad job at its assigned mission
2) the ISG is lying
I was asking under which assumption you were posting.
Neither. The ISG reported what Iraq was known to have purchased. Table 1 is led "Declared Iraqi International Uranium Purchases." It was not an assesment of what they might have purchased illegally.
There you go again. Blaming me of something I never said.
Do you have the foggiest idea how often you do that?
And verified with the IAEA what was in inventory and searched all over Iraq for WMDs including nuclear materials.The ISG reported what Iraq was known to have purchased.
Do you really know what their mission was?
Sorry if you didn't know what they did, but that's really your problem.
That's a different subject yet. I was refering to the material posted, and never implied the things you imply that I did.
Stop scrambling for excuses and admit you were wrong.
Oh wait... You are not man enough to...
You just go off onto another tanget and ask me to prove something I didn't say.
I'm done with this argument. It detracts from the thread. I stated my position clear enough and proved that you assume things I didn't say. You just don't stop.
Of course you did.
Were I scrambling, I would be posting about how smart I am, how I was so smart I didn't have to go to college and making up intelligence ratings for myself.Stop scrambling for excuses and admit you were wrong.
I'm not wrong enough to admit I'm wrong.Oh wait... You are not man enough to...
No, I was asking you to clarify whether you thought the ISG were a bunch of incompetents or a bunch of liars. Those were the only logical conclusions that could be drawn from your claim that they missed 1500 tons of yellowcake uranium. Of course there is a third option that you have no idea what you were talking about and pulled 1500 tons of yellowcake uranium straight out of your ass, but you are way too smart for that, right?You just go off onto another tanget and ask me to prove something I didn't say.
Actually it's very informative. You are so blindingly intelligent, you can work with facts that only exist in your mind. We unfortunate, college-indoctrinated ingrates can't even hope to fathom the dimensions of unreality in which your mind works. Logic as we know it and has existed for thousands of years has been transcended by you, and no one with fewer than four "+"s after his 99 intelligence rating could even pray to understand the ways of....I'm done with this argument. It detracts from the thread. I stated my position clear enough and proved that you assume things I didn't say. You just don't stop.
the Wild Cobra.
remind me to never get on chump's bad side..
Sorry Chump. I ran out of Troll food today.
As many times as you deviate from the topic and start personal attacks, that's all you are. A troll.A troll's main goal is usually to arouse anger and frustration among the message board's other participants, and will write whatever it takes to achieve this end. One popular trolling strategy is the practice of Winning by Losing. While the victim is trying to put forward solid and convincing facts to prove his position, the troll's only goal is to infuriate its prey. The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly illogical argument, and then vigorously defends it while mocking and insulting its prey. The troll looks like a complete fool, but this is all part of the plan. The victim becomes noticeably angry by trying to repeatedly explain the flaws of the troll's argument. Provoking this anger was the troll's one and only goal from the very beginning.
My arguments are logical in this dimension.
Let me know when you have a solid and convincing 1500 ton fact.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
