Reply With Quote
Is he still banging superhead?
I was waiting for one person to talk about Maher. There's one stick like you in every crowd.Maher would get his ass kicked.
Easy to cuss and CHARGE at someone when you are a millionaire and have 300 lb security guards in the middle of you and the other guy.
Maher's show is a joke. Not the funny kind.
Way to go
Is he still banging superhead?
stick? I pit you if you like this guy. He brings nothing other than a 1 hour wankfest for Bush haters. Nothing more. He rarely brings in guests who can actually debate...and when someone gets the best of him he cuts them off and moves on like a puss. Having this little troll act like he could actually kick someone out by himself was quality entertainment.
zOMG!!111 Maher talks about Bush 24/7 he's so cooooooooooooool.
*Waits for you to sterotype me as the 300 lb backwoods redneck who loves Bush, watches Nascar, hates gay people, is anti-abortion, and all that other garbage.*
Last edited by Walter Craparita; 10-23-2007 at 12:44 PM.
Just because you misinterpret something happening as obvious doesn't make you knowledgable. Have you actually watched the different videos in slow motion? There are explosions going off before the plane ever hits. Could I have somehow watched doctored footage? Sure, I'm only telling you what I saw.
Also, the buildings blew up as if they were detonated. Again, watch the videos. Many learned persons have spoken to this fact. Do I know for sure? No. However, if you watch a video of a building being detonated and the Twin towers, it sure looks similar.
Third, the steel structure within the Twin towers was built to withstand much higher temperatures and damages than would have been created by any flames or post crash explosions. Without any supplementary detonation, the wreckage should have remained close to as it was prior to the plane hitting. I am speaking only from what scientists and experts in building infrastructure say. I don't know this for a fact.
Could terrorists have hidden explosives in the building prior to the crash? Sure. I don't know what happened. I do think you're a jackass for trying to make everything appear so simple and anyone that thinks contrary stupid. You should probably gather some research before seranading us with your rain is wet and Moonlight Sonata lines.
Noted "Bush Basher" and recent guest on Real Time...
Jeeeezus, you couldn't be more wrong.
Have you even seen his show??
He regularly has conservative people showing up. He even had Ann "The " Coulter on his show!!! You're talking out of your ass.
He has been beat on occasion, in terms of debate, and he has acknowledged it. And, he actually protects Bush on this 9/11 conspiracy bull as well as Bush's stance on immigration.
It's not his fault, however, that Bush s up with enough regularity that makes it easy to make fun of his dumb ass.
The steel structure could not withstand the temperature of the jet fuel burning. That's backed up by science. And, the beams were covered in a fire re ant, but they weren't built to withstand the impact of a 747 hitting it.
If there would have been explosions before the airplanes hit, the building would not have stood as long as it did. What happened was that the jet fuel burned its way down the center/core of the bulding, were the main supports were at. When that happened, the building slowly became weaker until it could no longer support it's own weight.
I can appreciate a good conspiracy, and I actually believe a couple (JFK), but this one has no merit whatsoever.
What... you can talk , but can't take it? I'm sorry, but pussy motherf##cker's like you who can talk a ton of about Bush, the war in Iraq, etc. get their panties all up in a wad and sour when someone speaks even the slightest misnomer about their liberal superheroes. If you can give it, you better be humble enought to take it, dip .
Wow, those must be all over the Internet.
Link?
There was recently a special on A&E or the History Channel, where they examined the biggest conspiracy claims, one by one. And then refuted them with scientific data.
For example - the 'explosions' going off before the building collapse? Pockets of air, combined with ash, compressed glass and other small pieces of debris being forced out through the windows as the interior of the building began to fall. If the interior of the building in is weakened, as this was, then it will implode as if it was being demolished. It's like taking the central support from a house of cards, it all just falls down.
I am certain the special will re-air several more times, I suggest watching it. They approach the conspiracy theories seriously and give them good time to explain it. Some of the conspiracies are compelling, but they don't stand up to the scientific data.
I still believe in the JFK conspiracy, though.
Which one? I'm afraid you'll have to be more specific than that.
The Magic Bullet one.Which one? I'm afraid you'll have to be more specific than that.
The government offed him.
I believe this to be true.
let me dig up those mouse threads from the poli forum.
Maher is just one more mildly witty comedian.
But the fact that in his shows he always has more liberal guests than conservative ones, cannot be denied. At least two liberal guests, plus himself, plus the audience, against one right-wing/conservative dude (and this is only half of the time) is the normal format of Real Time.
Amen, Brother!!!!
He's invited conservatives to his show, but they've always declined.
They avoid black people and they avoid Maher.
The format is always 2 liberal guests against one conservative. Sometimes it's three liberal guests. That is when the show usually sucks.
bill maher is such a pompous ass. he looked like such a tough guy when he was shoving the security guard that was shoving out that dude. i'd love to see his ass get lit up.
Can you clarify this sentence, becuase I'm thinking it's a gay term for sex.
Do these particular hecklers think our government blew up the towers? Or just that there were bombs in them as part of the attack? I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the latter, given that middle eastern terrorists are bomb experts. I can see bombs being smuggled in there earlier somehow or even suicide bombings inside just to ensure the towers came down like they wanted, but no way our government was involved.
A 767 loaded with 10,000 gallons of fuel flying at 500 mph is a bomb.
hi evryone
....dumbest theory ever.
not that it is worth commenting on, but how do you suppose these 'al quedas' were able to strap heavily secured/camera filled buildings with bombs? did they just do it in broad daylight than or what?
im going to go out on a limb and say that 747's caused the collapse. 'blowback' is not just the name of a particularly memorable steven seagal movie.
Why is it dumb to think there might have been other explosives involved? I haven't seen any of the evidence the hecklers claim exists, but it's not farfetched to believe there could have been more to the plot than just airplanes. To answer your question though, I think it would be rather easy for professional terrorists to smuggle in bomb materials inside the WTC, given that 6 years after 9/11 75% of "fake" bomb materials can still be smuggled past airport screeners at LAX, where security is much tighter than a pre-9/11 WTC building.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions