Reply With Quote
Yeah, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett routinely play 100 games a year.smh @ the logic on display in this thread.... some of you are you just really stupid.
...because the Timberwolves, Sonics, and Celtics went so deep in the playoffs last year, there is no doubt they can maintain this pace again this season. Oh wait, that's completely false. Nice logic, there...
Yeah, Ray Allen, Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett routinely play 100 games a year.smh @ the logic on display in this thread.... some of you are you just really stupid.
they look good but the best team they beat was the Nuggets (easily I might add). they have beat
@ Raptors (nice win)
@ Pacers (bad team)
@ Nets (w/ VC; nice win)
Nets (w/o VC)
Washington (awful team right now)
ATL (rising team but cant win on road)
Nuggets(convincing win)
All I'm saying is what and see on this team before people think they are going to win 70 games. I think the lack of depth will catch up with them especially in the regular season
uhm, im talking about MINUTES PER GAME you ing genius, not total minutes.
also, playing 38 minutes alongside two other all-stars who take pressure off you is not the same as 38 minutes when you are the main focus of a defense.
boston will be just fine
Yes, those two numbers are completely unrelated. You're shaming me, Mr. Spock.
Last edited by Reggie Miller; 11-16-2007 at 04:03 PM.
Much ado about nothing. I imagine once the Celtics have the division won you will see the Big 3 play less minutes or sit out games.
I can't wait to see the Celts play the top West teams. Those will be fun games.
that's what I said too.
and tonight they moved to 8-0(against Miami). 1 pt game. Blew an 15-pt lead, almost lost but stayed perfect despite a near 4th Q meltdown
KG -41 minutes
Allen - 45 minutes
but
Pierce played only 35 minutes
I think the minutes for these "bit 3" are upped bec of the weak bench.
Right now i think Boston are licking their lips to face and see if this time they can beat the Celtic's hard-to-beat Tim Duncan's Spurs.
They are not winning 70 games. By the time they reach 55 - 60 wins I won't be surprised if the Big 3 play limited minutes or are shut down the last week of the regular season.
Boston will split the 2 games with the Spurs,Suns and Mavs. I don't see either of those 3 teams winning in Boston. I don't know the schedule but I am willing to bet that Mavs,Spurs and Suns play the Celtics as part of a B2B.that's what I said too.
and tonight they moved to 8-0(against Miami). 1 pt game. Blew an 15-pt lead, almost lost but stayed perfect despite a near meltdwon
KG -41 minutes
Allen - 45 minutes
but
Pierce played only 35 minutes
I think the minutes for these "bit 3" are upped bec of the weak bench.
Right now i think Boston are licking their lips to face and see if this time they can beat the Celtic's hard-to-beat Tim Duncan's Spurs.
Allen's gonna come off the bench once they got a taste of the premium teams..it's the current trend right now.
They need to find a way to get Tony Allen going. He was playing well last year prior to the injury he suffered from the dunk. Other then that I like thier bench. Posey hit some big shots and played Wade well on the last shot.
Wade shoulda drove his way to the lane rather than taking a jumper. Who am i anyway, Wade's the man, the man always know what to do.
Well said, well spoken B.G.
Spurs will be facing them @ Boston Feb 10 and March 17 @ AT&T.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
