TParker or DWade?

[xcoriate]

o back Pepito51

At this point Parker has merley played as a support player, and as a result you have to choose Wade at this point however later Parker may get an opportunity to shine on his own allowing him to be the primary option.

[adidas11]

How in the heck did this topic get started!?

Wade >>>> Parker

To say otherwise is pure lunacy.

[Jimcs50]

duh!

Here is another:

Would you trade Rasho for Shaq?

[kskonn]

I think at this point in shaqs carreer it would be tough to spend that kind of money. Obviously w/out contract issues in mind I think it would be great and the spurs would have the opportunity to win the next few championship with duncan and shaq on the team. However with contractual issues involved I would not trade for shaq. I feel for the players we would have to trade, the spurs would be losing overall value and youth and be jeopardizing their long term goals.

[IcemanCometh]

Wade

[1Parker1]

Why are people talking about who would you rather have Parker or Wade? If it ain't broke, why fix it? Parker is not who you all should be considering a trade for or comparing. He isn't the weakest link on the Spurs team, that belongs to Rasho.