Semper Fi!!
Very simplified explanation of both the Civil War and Iraq, but I agree with the fact that the civil war was not really about slavery and the Iraq war not about oil.
I certainly don't apologize for slavery either. It was a tragic thing, but no matter how you look at it, it had nothing to do with me.
"The war in Iraq is not about oil. It's about enforcing international agreements, possible threats to us, and liberation."
what total bull . 4000+ US dead, $2T wasted, with $Ts more planned for decades, no end, no "victory" in sight for those reasons?
no, Iraq is exclusively about oil. All the other 'reasons" are strictly dishonest pretexts to go after the oil.
Last edited by boutons_; 01-16-2008 at 05:57 PM.
Internets getting old for me. I've been on it before it has it's current form. I think my oldest web browser in a 1992 version, called IBrowse for the Amiga.
I simply have better things to do with my time. The hour or so I spend a day is already too much.
Absolutely. However, I hold everyone responsible for their action and words also. We have the freedom to say as we want. However, slander can be prosecuted, and rightly so. We have used sedition laws in the past. Too bad we don't use them today.
I don't use the beliefs as a qualifuer, but rather how one voices their beliefs during the ongoing events. However, technically, by unrevised definition... Those not supporting our military actions are not patriots. You cannot claim the badge by only fitting some of the requiremments. All conditions must be met. How can you be devoted to our country and speak ill of an ongoing effort?
Remember, I am one that uses old, unchanged definitions. Very few people will agree with me, but I accept that.
You are not that old, and neither is your infantile notion of patriotism.
Theodore Roosevelt was a progressive freedom-hating Yankee. Had the Confederacy won like it was supposed to, WC's view of patriotism would have held, and we would have avoided so many problems over the past 140 years by not allowing citizens to question the government in wartime.
Cons utionalism.
And what I said does not deviate from Theodore's quote...
I did use the qualifier that one must be right in voicing opposition. To oppose something that is right against the enemy emboldens them. To oppose our own wr9ogdoings is patriotic.
Granted. It's a hard line to find. It takes great diligence to understand the situation enough to be critical if one believes such. I am not saying that to feel we do wrong is unpatriotic. Just that in situations that our enemies would take someone's words and use it against us is real. That is why it is unpatriotic to speak out against ongoing situations unless you are certain the truth is on your side.
That is why I have called many of the democrats traitors. During a time of war, they use so called facts that are in dispute, and embolden the enemy.
Idiot Alert....
Care to explain how you extrapolate such a thing, or are you just practicing the art of propaganda?
I am going to go out on a limb and say patriotism isn't that hard to define.
I think the definition I gave earlier is simple enough.
So what does "devoted" mean... It means more than just love and respect, doesn't it?Definition; Patriot:
Devoted to the welfare of ones country.
And welfare?Devoted:
Appropriated by vow; consecrated; ardent; zealous; strongly attached
Those are the proper, unbas ized definitions.Welfare (well and fare):
Exempt from misfortune, sickness, calamity, or evil; the enjoyment of health and the common blessings of life; prosperity; happiness; and well being.
Explain to me how down talking our actions and leaders in a time of crisis, if not know to be true, can be considered patriotic?
To be patriotic is to be an ardent supporter to the nations well being. How does words of disrespect to the office of the Commander in Chief show patriotism to our friends and enemies?
Those of you liberals wishing misfortune to our president...
Can you call yourselves patriots by the above definitions?
How childish.
"Daddy scolded me for doing something wrong. Obviously, Daddy isn't devoted to my welfare! Waaaaahhhh!"
Yes, yours is a childish example.
No relevance to the democrats politicizing against our president in a time of war. A parent is the authority. Congress is an equal branch, not superior to the presidency. They at least need to treat him with respect, and not orchestrate a losing scenario for war like they have been.
Those who have openly opposed our president in giving aide and comfort to the enemy are traitors. Not patriots.
Like I said before. It's fine to disagree. However, some things need to be kept at internal communications levels. Any time the democrats speak out against our president, the war, etc. The enemies make a big deal about it.
Democrats have caused the death of soldiers that otherwise would not have occurred! They continued over and over to call our presence in Iraq, and occupation. If we were occupied, we would fight back. Guess what. Iraqi's hearing such words from our own leaders, made many fight against Americans, that otherwise wouldn't. Part of the reduction of violence is because the truth is spreading. We ware there to rebuild their nation. Not occupy and steal their oil.
When you hear prominent figures say "We are there for oil" or cal us "occupiers," count on the enemies propaganda machine using that to their fullest to convince more people to join and kill more American soldiers.
Democrats and the media have so much blood on their hands, it's ridiculous.
Invading Iraq in the first place is the prime factor in jihadist propaganda. Bush has so much blood on his hands, it's far beyond ridiculous.
And you completely missed the point Teddy Roosevelt was making.
The propaganda was always there. The media just didn't have a republican president to blame it on before. It's the democrats that the Jihadists feature in their propaganda. They use the democrats own words!
I didn't miss any of the points. I fully understand and support them.
Have I ever said not to speak the truth? No. I said to make certain you are right. Make sure your words are true.Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.
We have just cause to be in Iraq. We would probably have more dead Americans if we didn't go to war. At least president Bush has accepted his role as Commander in Chief and tried to perform the task well.
"Nothing but the truth should be spoken"
How many time do I hear liberal lies about our president?
You guy's make me sick. Lie about him and call yourselves patriots... Give me a break...
I love my country and would lay my life down for her.
I guess I should also add that even though a president can make decisions that harm our country I just need to shut and play good citizien..Keep my mouth shut.
Simple enough.
Presidents of the past found that at ude borderline treasonous.
Sign of the times, I guess.
a crisis created by the leader.
someone should have told bush that, because he has problems when he thinks alone.To be patriotic is to be an ardent supporter to the nations well being.
by promising our friends that we'll follow the path of truth and justice, and promise not to burden their people and countries with foolish and dangerous endeavors again.How does words of disrespect to the office of the Commander in Chief show patriotism to our friends and enemies?
he can keep his money, just vanish.Those of you liberals wishing misfortune to our president...
by definition, you're a minion.Can you call yourselves patriots by the above definitions?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)