Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 54
  1. #26
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Hey Bruno, this trade would work, right?

    Barry + Elson + Bonner + re-signed Van Exel (a la Aaron McKie) for Miller + Cardinal

    That looks like a realistic trade that the Grizzlies would be all over. It'd be a risky trade for the Spurs just because of chemistry issues but I'd probably do it. In this scenario, I doubt the Grizzlies would be able to squeeze out any draft picks.

    But yeah, the Spurs would need to follow it
    up by bringing in PJ Brown, Dale Davis ... or even Tony Massenburg.

    Do that trade, sign PJ brown.

    ring # 5 would be upon us.

  2. #27
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Thats all assuming the Grizzlies would want Matt Bonner.

  3. #28
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    We're a little boned in the size department if the old vets don't want to leave their rocking chairs. Of course there are a couple of big boys in the D-League that might rebound as well as Brown without going over the tax.
    Don't you think spurs will be more looking for a defender than a rebounder ?

  4. #29
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,468
    Barry : $5.55M
    Elson : $3M
    Bonner : $2M (BYC)
    NVE : $1.45M (max allowed)

    Total : $12M
    Miller + Cardinal : $14.1M.

    Yes, it works.
    They should swap first rounders with us if we are going to save them that much money.

  5. #30
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Doubtfull they'd give up that lottery pick.

  6. #31
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,468
    Don't you think spurs will be more looking for a defender than a rebounder ?
    I think Lang and Alexander would be defensive choices against the big players. We'd take Benson if we wanted to push the pace like we do with Elson. They just all happen to rebound very well, which is Andre Brown's biggest asset.

  7. #32
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,468
    Doubtfull they'd give up that lottery pick.
    You're probably right, but that is a ton of money we'd be saving them. Maybe work out some protection for it for a couple of years.

  8. #33
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Lottery protection this year, all out next year.

    I could go for that. Didn't they get the Laker's first round pick also?

    What the , throw that one in there.

    Getting a late first round selection is better than none at all.

  9. #34
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,068
    I don't see the Spurs FO wanting to pick up Cardinal's salary. In fact that would shock me.

  10. #35
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Unforunately I also can't see Pop or anyone else taking back Brian Cardinal.

    I mean whats the difference between him and Pittsnogle other than the really cool name.

  11. #36
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    I don't see the Spurs FO wanting to pick up Cardinal's salary. In fact that would shock me.
    Great minds think alike Eddy

  12. #37
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    If Grizz hadn't succeed at packaging Cardinal with Gasol, I doubt they will be able to do it with Miller.
    I don't think Spurs are ready to take Cardinal to get Miller.
    Cardinal is worthless so taking him will be like paying $15M or $16M per year for Miller.
    Miller isn't worth that much money.

  13. #38
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I've said this about a week ago. Mike Miller for Barry Elson 1st round pick. Screw Cardinal's salary. Give Memphis all of our picks in this year's draft.

  14. #39
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Screw Cardinal's salary
    Easy to say.

    If they say to get Miller you gotta take Cardinal, and you say no, they say no deal, what do you do?

  15. #40
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,068
    Cardinal is worthless so taking him will be like paying $15M or $16M per year for Miller.
    Miller isn't worth that much money.
    Well put.

  16. #41
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,468
    What if we did get a protected lottery pick out of it?

    Remember, this is not a basketball trade for Memphis.

  17. #42
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,068
    I had to look up Cardinal's stats. He's a career 6 pt, 3 rebounds a game guy. His best year was 9.6 pts and 4.2 boards in '03-'04 with Golden State. He's getting a whopping 3 pts per game this year.

    His agent must be a god.

  18. #43
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    8,041
    I know it's easy to say. But if Memphis refuses to give us Mike Miller without Cardinal's contract. I know the Spurs brass would drop out. Especially with Holt's penny pinching ways.

  19. #44
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,468
    I know it's easy to say. But if Memphis refuses to give us Mike Miller without Cardinal's contract. I know the Spurs brass would drop out. Especially with Holt's penny pinching ways.
    If the Spurs stayed under the tax threshold, there wouldn't be much reason for Holt to deny it.

  20. #45
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    If Grizz hadn't succeed at packaging Cardinal with Gasol, I doubt they will be able to do it with Miller.
    I don't think Spurs are ready to take Cardinal to get Miller.
    Cardinal is worthless so taking him will be like paying $15M or $16M per year for Miller.
    Miller isn't worth that much money.
    The other way to think of it is to factor in how much else the Spurs would have to give the Grizzlies without taking back Cardinal. If the Grizzlies say okay we'll take Elson, Barry, a first rounder, your second rounder from the Raptors and either Mahinmi or Splitter ... I'm not sure that's any better than just biting the bullet on Cardinals contract.

    If it's as simple as Elson, Barry and a first rounder, that's a no-brainer. But I think the Grizzlies would want more and would likely go for either Splitter or Mahinmi, whichever they rank higher. And seeing how they just traded for Gasol's brother, I'm guessing they'd want Splitter since it's obvious they watch international basketball. Giving up Splitter as a sweetener in a deal would kinda suck. I'd probably rather just see Cardinal rot on the bench.

  21. #46
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Barry : $5.55M
    Elson : $3M
    Bonner : $2M (BYC)
    NVE : $1.45M (max allowed)

    Total : $12M
    Miller + Cardinal : $14.1M.

    Yes, it works.
    Thanks

    The only part of that trade that doesn't make sense is it'd push the Spurs even further over the luxury tax threshold. The Spurs would basically be spending like $35M for Miller for two seasons

  22. #47
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    Giving up Splitter as a sweetener in a deal would kinda suck.
    No way I'd do it then.

    Splitter is gonna be the starting center on this team for a while due to the now resurgence twords BIG centers and thats what Splitter is.

    Splitter Elson Barry for just a guard?

    Mahinmi ain't gonna guard the BIG BIGS well. Theres no younger centers better to get than Splitter himself.

    Bad move it would be IMO.

  23. #48
    Damn You Commies T Park's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    55,054
    The Spurs would basically be spending like $35M for Miller for two seasons
    Money wise...

    Miller = Marion?

  24. #49
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    I had to look up Cardinal's stats. He's a career 6 pt, 3 rebounds a game guy. His best year was 9.6 pts and 4.2 boards in '03-'04 with Golden State. He's getting a whopping 3 pts per game this year.

    His agent must be a god.
    Cardinal's contract story is freaking funny.

    An exceptionally well-connected league insider once told me the story of how Brian Cardinal got his mid-level. Seems Memphis owner Michael Heisley, frustrated by general manager Jerry West's lack of activity, walked into West's office one day and asked why he hadn't signed anyone yet. So an exasperated West picked up his phone, called Cardinal's agent and offered the mid-level on the spot. Then he turned to Heisley and said something along the lines of "There, you happy now?"
    http://blogs.indystar.com/pacersinsi...he_gun_an.html

  25. #50
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    The other way to think of it is to factor in how much else the Spurs would have to give the Grizzlies without taking back Cardinal. If the Grizzlies say okay we'll take Elson, Barry, a first rounder, your second rounder from the Raptors and either Mahinmi or Splitter ... I'm not sure that's any better than just biting the bullet on Cardinals contract.
    I think that taking Cardinal's contract is like giving 4 late first round picks to Grizzlies.
    I don't think that Miller is worth that much.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •