I JUST finished reading it, so good timing.
It's a lot to sift through, but I wish there was a way to paste it here, because you bring up some excellent points.
I think in terms of pure basketball talent, Mcgrady > Manu
but like you said, it's Manu's heart and determination that really gets the two to become very comparable
Also that Nitro guy is a moron. Manu is a third wheel and a role player? uhh what??
The Spurs wouldn't have any rings from 2005 or 2007 had it not been for Manu, and had it not been for his steal at midcourt from R. jefferson, we easily could've been looking at a game 7 in the 2003 finals.
You were also spot on about the team being 1a 1b and 1c in terms of options on offense for SA. I actually PREFER Manu taking the final shot over TD, because he can hit from outside and inside.
I feel that TD would just get hammered in the post with a no call at the buzzer. (refs hardly call fouls with 5 seconds or less left, so I think we're better off with manu creating his own shot in that situation)
I'm also gonna say this:
Manu would get the rockets past the first round. He may go through inconsistency periods, but he would have a fourth quarter outburst and at least let them see rd. 2. I also think he's a FAR better passer than T Mac. The Nitro was making T-Mac come off as John Stockton with his ability to play PG, but I don't buy it. I mean, Fabricio Oberto probably owes his career to Ginobili, whereas T-Mac probably hurts Yao more than helps him. He's the wrong player in the wrong system.
The thread you posted in was a great read![]()

Reply With Quote
