Reply With Quote
LMAO at either party followers calling the other hypocritical.
Seems sort of hypocritical.
What I find hypocritical about the people defending mccain is that we have heard that there is no proof, anonymous sources, inuendo, etc... for which I agree with them..yet those same people have no prblem believing every conspiracy theory regarding the clintons.. if it's about the clintons there is no proof necessary..
(see ray and extra stout)
LMAO at either party followers calling the other hypocritical.
Seems sort of hypocritical.
We'll see who's the hypocrite when one of Hillary's snipers takes out Obama during his acceptance speech at the DNC.
You mean there wasn't a blue dress and the Chinese
didn't exist? And dishwashers in NYC really do make
that kinda money and the postal workers in California
make above normal wages. Is that what you mean?
And Clinton didn't really fly off to some ME country
with a zillionaire on his private plane and help him
land a zillion dollar deal on mining and he didn't collect
how much was it now, five hundred grand.
Just proves a point I've said a long time ago. Media bias. The proper name for the paper of record is the New York Slime. When the paper of record resorts to having stories with less credibility than gossip rags, they show their true allegiance.
At best, this is someone in the office joking about the two, and someone else speaking of it. People of all affiliations have come out who know McCain and said this is outside his character.
I don't particularly like defending McCain, but this is a very cheesy story. I guess they couldn't find anything better fir a hit piece.
Didn't Newt cheat on his wife or something?
These idiots. Is it really that hard to not cheat on your wife when you are trying to run a lifetime political career? All that money and power you get to acquire and you jeopardies it on THAT? Come on.
Yeah, who would ruin a perfectly good career just to prolong it by maybe a year or two?
Sincerely,
Roger Clemens
P.S. Jeopardies?
What is the ultimate goal of obtaining all that power?
To PULL!
http://www.newsweek.com/id/114505
A Hole in McCain’s Defense?
An apparent contradiction in his response to lobbyist story.
A sworn deposition that Sen. John McCain gave in a lawsuit more than five years ago appears to contradict one part of a sweeping denial that his campaign issued this week to rebut a New York Times story about his ties to a Washington lobbyist.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
