Spurs' offense varied, efficient

[whottt]

He got plenty of time. Quit acting like you are not ing about minutes.

I don't recall ing about Barry's minutes after the Pacer game...I wanted him in the second half when we were choking a lead away and I got him..and I was quite happy with it. I wasn't happy with it because Barry was going to average a certain amount of minutes...


...I was happy with it because it was tough game and Pop trusted Barry at an important stage of the game and gave him a chance to impact the game....unlike with Horry in the Orl loss, or Barry in the Houston and Seattle losses...etc.

IF that weak -2 is the best you can do, just off before you embarass yourself.

[ChumpDumper]

"If only we had played ___ at ___ time -- guaranteed win."

[whottt]

Saying Hedo>Manu is a clear distortion and a stupid oversimplification.

Takes one to know one, besides, that was the le of the thread in which the debate originated and you stood firmly on the side of it's author.

No you started weaseling right after the first post.

Yawn.

You want to micromanage the PT of every Spur and the slightest deviation from your ideal makes you wet your pants.

No, blowing leads due to stupidity upsets me...it really upsets me when the most offensively smart players are not given a chance to stem the tide. I'm not near as picky about it as you want to imagine. It's pretty obvious what sets me off. And stop saying it's about set minutes with me because it isn't. It's about giving our 5 excellent bench players a chance to impact the game in both halves...that's all it's about.

"If only we had played ___ at ___ time -- guaranteed win." We get it.

More like...If only we had given Barry a chance in the second half while we are blowing a lead, or given Horry any PT at all in a game...we might not have lost it. Even if Barry's shot isn't falling...and even if Horry hadn't been playing good : puke

And don't speak for the collective...

[whottt]

"Your reading is inefficient"

is why I don't depend on it for this kind of work. browser find-in-page is what I used for my searches, and "spurs" gets one hit. How many does yours get?

Dunno because I never use browser find, if I am searching for it in that way I'll type it into my google bar.

Edit: BTW, if you look up efficiency per 48 you see Tim at #1 and Manu at #7...Spurs are the only team with two players in the top 10 eff/per48.

[ChumpDumper]

you stood firmly on the side of it's author

"leaning" toward Hedo's being a better player than Manu by the end of his career is a firm "Manu > Hedo" the very second of that argument? More distortion by you.

More like...If only we had given Barry a chance in the second half while we are blowing a lead, or given Horry any PT at all in a game...we might not have lost it.

Nice backtracking. Then quit saying those games were thrown away.

[boutons]

theres's only one Spurs hit on this page:

http://www.nba.com/statistics/2004/d...opic=0&stat=27

vs 2 -4 hits for other contenders.

[whottt]

[whottt]

theres's only one Spurs hit on this page:

http://www.nba.com/statistics/2004/d...opic=0&stat=27

vs 2 -4 hits for other contenders.

Weird, I got there through this page:


http://www.nba.com/statistics/efficiency.html

Click on the leaders link at the top of the center of the page and it takes you to an old page. Yours is the newer one...Jason Hart being among the league leaders probably should have tipped me...but I was looking for Manu and Manu only.

[ChumpDumper]

[whottt]